header-logo header-logo

10 June 2016 / Cathrine Grubb
Issue: 7702 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Cutting out the middleman

nlj_7702_grubb

Cathrine Grubb examines the impact of the coming into force of the Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010

Since the coming into force of the Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 1930 (TP(RAI)A 1930), those who have suffered loss at the hands of an insured person who becomes bankrupt/insolvent have been able to enforce their rights against the insurer. However, a potential third party claimant is unable to enforce such rights until first establishing liability against the insured. Generally, this would mean issuing proceedings against the insured, which in the case of a dissolved company would also require an application to restore it to the Companies Register under s 1029 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006).

The only current exception to the inability to sue the insurer directly, are claims brought under para 2 of the European Communities (Rights Against Insurers) Regulations 2002 (SI 2002/3061). Paragraph 2 applies to most cases arising out of a road traffic accident on a public road in the UK, for which there is a relevant insurance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll