header-logo header-logo

10 June 2016 / Cathrine Grubb
Issue: 7702 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Cutting out the middleman

nlj_7702_grubb

Cathrine Grubb examines the impact of the coming into force of the Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010

Since the coming into force of the Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 1930 (TP(RAI)A 1930), those who have suffered loss at the hands of an insured person who becomes bankrupt/insolvent have been able to enforce their rights against the insurer. However, a potential third party claimant is unable to enforce such rights until first establishing liability against the insured. Generally, this would mean issuing proceedings against the insured, which in the case of a dissolved company would also require an application to restore it to the Companies Register under s 1029 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006).

The only current exception to the inability to sue the insurer directly, are claims brought under para 2 of the European Communities (Rights Against Insurers) Regulations 2002 (SI 2002/3061). Paragraph 2 applies to most cases arising out of a road traffic accident on a public road in the UK, for which there is a relevant insurance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll