header-logo header-logo

Cyber criminals targeting lawyers

27 June 2023
Categories: Legal News , Cyber , Cybercrime , Profession
printer mail-detail
Law practices are prime targets for cyber criminals due to their handling of highly confidential, commercially sensitive and often personal information, a major report by the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) has highlighted

Information on ongoing criminal cases or mergers and acquisitions are valuable to criminals interested in insider trading or subverting the course of justice, according to the NCSC’s ‘Cyber threat report: UK legal sector’, published last week.

Time pressures associated with transactions and the substantial sums being handled create attractive conditions for phishing attacks and email compromise. The high cost of disruption to legal practices, in terms of reputation, billable hours and costs to clients, make legal practices enticing to ransomware gangs looking to extort money in return for restoring IT services.

For example, a ransomware gang attacked Tuckers Solicitors in 2020, encrypting case data and back-ups and publishing data relating to 60 court cases on the dark web. Tuckers refused to pay the ransom, and worked with the police on their investigation.

The report emphasises that all law practices are under threat, whether barristers’ chambers, sole practitioners, larger firms or in-house legal department. It identifies who might attempt a cyber-attack, outlines different types of attack, offers advice on prevention, and explains what to do next.

Alex Bransome, chief information security officer at Doherty Associates, said the report ‘highlights that the digital landscape is a double-edged sword for the legal sector.

‘While technology unlocks unprecedented efficiencies, it is also exposing the sector to new, sophisticated threats. Law firms must integrate cyber security into the DNA of their operations, making it a priority from the boardroom to the intern’s desk. This begins with cultivating an informed and vigilant workforce, fostering an organisational culture that respects and understands cyber hygiene. 

“It’s also about adopting best practice standards, leveraging resources like the NCSC’s guidance, and partnering with cyber security experts.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll