header-logo header-logo

27 June 2023
Categories: Legal News , Cyber , Cybercrime , Profession
printer mail-detail

Cyber criminals targeting lawyers

Law practices are prime targets for cyber criminals due to their handling of highly confidential, commercially sensitive and often personal information, a major report by the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) has highlighted

Information on ongoing criminal cases or mergers and acquisitions are valuable to criminals interested in insider trading or subverting the course of justice, according to the NCSC’s ‘Cyber threat report: UK legal sector’, published last week.

Time pressures associated with transactions and the substantial sums being handled create attractive conditions for phishing attacks and email compromise. The high cost of disruption to legal practices, in terms of reputation, billable hours and costs to clients, make legal practices enticing to ransomware gangs looking to extort money in return for restoring IT services.

For example, a ransomware gang attacked Tuckers Solicitors in 2020, encrypting case data and back-ups and publishing data relating to 60 court cases on the dark web. Tuckers refused to pay the ransom, and worked with the police on their investigation.

The report emphasises that all law practices are under threat, whether barristers’ chambers, sole practitioners, larger firms or in-house legal department. It identifies who might attempt a cyber-attack, outlines different types of attack, offers advice on prevention, and explains what to do next.

Alex Bransome, chief information security officer at Doherty Associates, said the report ‘highlights that the digital landscape is a double-edged sword for the legal sector.

‘While technology unlocks unprecedented efficiencies, it is also exposing the sector to new, sophisticated threats. Law firms must integrate cyber security into the DNA of their operations, making it a priority from the boardroom to the intern’s desk. This begins with cultivating an informed and vigilant workforce, fostering an organisational culture that respects and understands cyber hygiene. 

“It’s also about adopting best practice standards, leveraging resources like the NCSC’s guidance, and partnering with cyber security experts.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll