header-logo header-logo

Damage: home or away?

25 July 2013 / William Wraight
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
rexfeatures_2121709a

What do those hurt outside the EU have to show to get their PI claims heard in an English court? William Wraight reports
 

In claims arising from accidents abroad, particular consideration needs to be given to the issue of jurisdiction. For claims arising out of accidents within the European Union, Regulation 44/2001 (the Judgments Regulation) governs the issue and, following the judgment of the European Court of Justice in FBTO v Odenbreit C-463/06 [2008] 2 All ER Comm 733; [2007] ECR I-11321, the jurisdiction of the English or Welsh courts over claims against the tortfeasor’s insurer can often be established.

For claims arising from accidents in non-EU countries, matters are not so straightforward and the permission of the court is required before proceedings can be validly served out of the jurisdiction. CPR 6.37 sets out the procedural framework for applications for such permissions and encapsulates the criteria that the court will consider, which are that:

  • the claim must pass through one of the “gateways” to the jurisdiction, as are set out in CPR
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll