header-logo header-logo

25 July 2013 / William Wraight
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Damage: home or away?

rexfeatures_2121709a

What do those hurt outside the EU have to show to get their PI claims heard in an English court? William Wraight reports
 

In claims arising from accidents abroad, particular consideration needs to be given to the issue of jurisdiction. For claims arising out of accidents within the European Union, Regulation 44/2001 (the Judgments Regulation) governs the issue and, following the judgment of the European Court of Justice in FBTO v Odenbreit C-463/06 [2008] 2 All ER Comm 733; [2007] ECR I-11321, the jurisdiction of the English or Welsh courts over claims against the tortfeasor’s insurer can often be established.

For claims arising from accidents in non-EU countries, matters are not so straightforward and the permission of the court is required before proceedings can be validly served out of the jurisdiction. CPR 6.37 sets out the procedural framework for applications for such permissions and encapsulates the criteria that the court will consider, which are that:

  • the claim must pass through one of the “gateways” to the jurisdiction, as are set out in
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll