header-logo header-logo

21 January 2010 / Alison Last , Michael Anderson
Issue: 7401 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Damages: Factortame returns

Michael Anderson & Alison Last report on the complexities of the Thin Cap legislation

Mr Justice Henderson handed down his judgment in Test Claimants in the Thin Cap Group Litigation v Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs [2009] EWHC 2908 (Ch), [2009] All ER (D) 218 (Nov) (the Thin Cap case) last November. The details of the litigation are discussed in further detail below, however, it is of note here that, for the first time in a tax related claim, the High Court has found that a provision of national law was in breach of community law to a sufficiently serious degree, such that it gave rise to a claim for damages under Factortame.

In Brasserie du Pêcheur SA v Germany; R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame Ltd & Ors (No. 4) Joined Cases C-46/93 & C-48/93 (Factortame), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) laid down the three conditions which had to be met in order to establish such a claim: the rule of law infringed must have been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll