header-logo header-logo

Dangerous cargoes

220699
Michael L Nash reflects on collisions, causes & consequences

Ships at sea, in the vast oceans of the world, always face dangers, even in this age of communications only dreamed of by previous mariners: dangers of collision, especially in bad visibility, fire, explosion, enemy action, hurricanes, icebergs, whirlpools, hidden reefs and sandbanks, volcanic activity, ships abandoned and still afloat. The list seems endless.

Then, of course, there are the consequences of loss, and the possibility that the vessel which is lost was carrying a dangerous cargo, sometimes not declared as to its true nature, especially in wartime or a time of political tension.

Added to this are the legal consequences: insurance, litigation, arbitration, mediation, commissions of inquiry—interim and final—which will include the causes of the loss, natural, human and accidental. And if all rockets point in one direction with regard to fault, is there sufficient proof? Is the loss res ipsa loquitur, or is it circumstantial?

New hazards & responsibilities

Can the law, and the design of ships,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll