header-logo header-logo

Dangerous cargoes

220699
Michael L Nash reflects on collisions, causes & consequences

Ships at sea, in the vast oceans of the world, always face dangers, even in this age of communications only dreamed of by previous mariners: dangers of collision, especially in bad visibility, fire, explosion, enemy action, hurricanes, icebergs, whirlpools, hidden reefs and sandbanks, volcanic activity, ships abandoned and still afloat. The list seems endless.

Then, of course, there are the consequences of loss, and the possibility that the vessel which is lost was carrying a dangerous cargo, sometimes not declared as to its true nature, especially in wartime or a time of political tension.

Added to this are the legal consequences: insurance, litigation, arbitration, mediation, commissions of inquiry—interim and final—which will include the causes of the loss, natural, human and accidental. And if all rockets point in one direction with regard to fault, is there sufficient proof? Is the loss res ipsa loquitur, or is it circumstantial?

New hazards & responsibilities

Can the law, and the design of ships,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
back-to-top-scroll