header-logo header-logo

01 May 2008 / Imran Awan
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

The dangers of silencing dissent

The new offence of glorifying terrorism will make Britain less safe, says Imran Awan

The Terrorism Act 2006 (TA 2006) has made the “glorification” of terrorism a criminal offence. The difficulty with this provision is clear—when you outlaw freedom of speech you are violating civil liberties and this will surely result in Britain becoming less safe by silencing dissent.

Swept up in this new anti-terror safety net could be those who protest against dictators such as Zimbabwe's Robert Mugabe. This has in turn created further difficulties in respect of freedom of expression, for example a statement published in a book, newspaper, pamphlet or magazine may be read, either in hard copy or on the Internet, by UK nationals, foreign visitors and people abroad.

Passionate Expression

Under the Act a person's passionate expression might be interpreted as recklessness. If someone is calling for the end of a particular rogue regime it is not particularly relevant whether they are negligent or reckless in the way they do so. Speech offences

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll