header-logo header-logo

01 May 2008 / Imran Awan
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

The dangers of silencing dissent

The new offence of glorifying terrorism will make Britain less safe, says Imran Awan

The Terrorism Act 2006 (TA 2006) has made the “glorification” of terrorism a criminal offence. The difficulty with this provision is clear—when you outlaw freedom of speech you are violating civil liberties and this will surely result in Britain becoming less safe by silencing dissent.

Swept up in this new anti-terror safety net could be those who protest against dictators such as Zimbabwe's Robert Mugabe. This has in turn created further difficulties in respect of freedom of expression, for example a statement published in a book, newspaper, pamphlet or magazine may be read, either in hard copy or on the Internet, by UK nationals, foreign visitors and people abroad.

Passionate Expression

Under the Act a person's passionate expression might be interpreted as recklessness. If someone is calling for the end of a particular rogue regime it is not particularly relevant whether they are negligent or reckless in the way they do so. Speech offences

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll