header-logo header-logo

25 October 2018
Issue: 7814 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Data leak wake-up call

Supermarket vicariously liable for employee breach

Supermarket giant WM Morrison has lost its appeal against a ruling that it is liable for an intentional data breach by an employee, in the first class action data breach case.

In 2014, the supermarket’s disgruntled internal auditor, Andrew Skelton, posted bank account details, salary information, national insurance numbers, addresses and phone numbers of 100,000 employees to data sharing websites. Skelton was sentenced to eight years in prison and Morrison was held vicariously liable for his actions.

Ruling in WM Morrison Supermarkets v Various claimants [2018] EWCA Civ 2339, the Court of Appeal unanimously held the supermarket giant liable to the 5,518 claimants who sought compensation. Morrisons has been refused permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Nick McAleenan, partner at JMW Solicitors, who represented the claimants, said: ‘They were obliged to hand over sensitive personal information and had every right to expect it to remain confidential, but a copy was made and it was uploaded to the internet and they were put at risk of fraud, identity theft and a host of other problems. ‘Unsurprisingly, this caused a huge amount of worry, stress and inconvenience. The judgment is a wake-up call for business.’

Nicola Cain, partner at RPC, said: ‘The Court of Appeal’s decision in the Morrisons case is a stark warning to all businesses that they can end up facing huge data breach compensation claims despite doing nothing wrong at all.

‘The High Court specifically made the point that Morrisons met its legal obligations to protect its employees’ personal data. It was as much a victim in this case as those who had their data breached.’

Issue: 7814 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll