header-logo header-logo

24 January 2008 / John Holden
Issue: 7305 / Categories: Features , Media , Public , Other practice areas
printer mail-detail

Data recovery

John Holden highlights how advances in technology can help with workplace computer investigations

Ninety per cent of today’s written communication is estimated to be electronic, of which 70% never gets printed. Our computers log not only what documents we create, but also what time we start work, when we break for lunch and when we leave for home. They can record how we have changed a document, where we have sought additional input and what we did in the meantime. Some “deleted” documents are just set to one side and can be recovered at the click of a mouse. It is now more difficult to obtain all the documents relevant to a case. To address this change in the business environment, a relatively new discipline called forensic technology has developed. Professionals in this field can recover, interpret and present data that may otherwise have been unavailable for review, using specially designed tools.

 

The most important part of this process is gathering the source data. Unless this is carried out properly there

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll