header-logo header-logo

10 December 2019
Issue: 7868 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Davis: winning hearts & minds

175th Law Society President driven to promote diversity & UK PLC 

Promoting the UK legal market abroad and ‘making diversity mainstream’ will continue as priorities for the Law Society in 2020, its president has said.

In an interview with NLJ this week Law Society president Simon Davis says he is not surprised the big US firms and legal arms of the Big Four accountants want their slice of the UK market with legal services revenue increasing by 6% year-on-year to £35.5bn in 2018, according to a recent CityUK report. 

With 200 foreign law firms and thousands of international lawyers, Davis says England ‘must come pretty close to being the most competitive legal centre in the world’, and describes this as ‘a welcome reality’. The focus must be on ‘increasing the size of the cake’ rather than denigrating the opposition, he adds.

Davis points out that, post-Brexit, English law will still be ‘respected under various treaties’, judges will still be ‘highly competent and impartial’ and solicitors will still ‘regard their day job as keeping clients out of court. ‘None of that is going to change. If anything, the possibility of Brexit has been a good spur to make sure what we offer is more broadly broadcast’

Davis, a Clifford Chance partner and former president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, is keen to promote diversity and inclusion (D&I). He believes the way forward is to bring issues together and treat them as ‘part of one package and not as separate strands’ to make diversity mainstream rather than push it to the margins. 

He says: ‘The society and other organisations rightly generate policies and guidance but what matters most of all is having the right culture in the workplace—one of warmth and emotional connection.’

He has campaigned on legal aid issues throughout his presidency and will continue to do so. Practitioners fear the long-awaited post-implementation review of LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) may be left on the backburner amid continuing political turmoil. However, Davis predicts whoever forms the next government will put more resources into the justice system. 

Issue: 7868 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll