header-logo header-logo

Davis: winning hearts & minds

10 December 2019
Issue: 7868 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
175th Law Society President driven to promote diversity & UK PLC 

Promoting the UK legal market abroad and ‘making diversity mainstream’ will continue as priorities for the Law Society in 2020, its president has said.

In an interview with NLJ this week Law Society president Simon Davis says he is not surprised the big US firms and legal arms of the Big Four accountants want their slice of the UK market with legal services revenue increasing by 6% year-on-year to £35.5bn in 2018, according to a recent CityUK report. 

With 200 foreign law firms and thousands of international lawyers, Davis says England ‘must come pretty close to being the most competitive legal centre in the world’, and describes this as ‘a welcome reality’. The focus must be on ‘increasing the size of the cake’ rather than denigrating the opposition, he adds.

Davis points out that, post-Brexit, English law will still be ‘respected under various treaties’, judges will still be ‘highly competent and impartial’ and solicitors will still ‘regard their day job as keeping clients out of court. ‘None of that is going to change. If anything, the possibility of Brexit has been a good spur to make sure what we offer is more broadly broadcast’

Davis, a Clifford Chance partner and former president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, is keen to promote diversity and inclusion (D&I). He believes the way forward is to bring issues together and treat them as ‘part of one package and not as separate strands’ to make diversity mainstream rather than push it to the margins. 

He says: ‘The society and other organisations rightly generate policies and guidance but what matters most of all is having the right culture in the workplace—one of warmth and emotional connection.’

He has campaigned on legal aid issues throughout his presidency and will continue to do so. Practitioners fear the long-awaited post-implementation review of LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) may be left on the backburner amid continuing political turmoil. However, Davis predicts whoever forms the next government will put more resources into the justice system. 

Issue: 7868 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll