header-logo header-logo

De-coding ACAS

28 January 2010 / Vicky Regan , Dominic Regan
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan & Vicky Regan unpick the new disciplinary code

Dominic Regan & Vicky Regan unpick the new disciplinary code
Those vile statutory disciplinary procedures are now dead and gone. However, employers can still get it badly wrong under the new regime. The aim of this note is to take stock of the new position and to identify emerging difficulties.

The ACAS (Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service) Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures is now the source of prevailing wisdom. While its intention is to promote a more flexible formula to deal with problems in the workplace, uncertainty may arise when considering what actions are “reasonable” or “fair” when conducting disciplinary processes. While the areas of uncertainty will need to be clarified through case law, many of the requirements under the code mirror the repealed statutory regime.

With its emphasis on informal resolution the code, consisting of 45 paragraphs in total, provides a less prescriptive set of procedures that “should” be followed in any disciplinary process. The code is not legally binding, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll