header-logo header-logo

De-coding ACAS

28 January 2010 / Vicky Regan , Dominic Regan
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan & Vicky Regan unpick the new disciplinary code

Dominic Regan & Vicky Regan unpick the new disciplinary code
Those vile statutory disciplinary procedures are now dead and gone. However, employers can still get it badly wrong under the new regime. The aim of this note is to take stock of the new position and to identify emerging difficulties.

The ACAS (Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service) Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures is now the source of prevailing wisdom. While its intention is to promote a more flexible formula to deal with problems in the workplace, uncertainty may arise when considering what actions are “reasonable” or “fair” when conducting disciplinary processes. While the areas of uncertainty will need to be clarified through case law, many of the requirements under the code mirror the repealed statutory regime.

With its emphasis on informal resolution the code, consisting of 45 paragraphs in total, provides a less prescriptive set of procedures that “should” be followed in any disciplinary process. The code is not legally binding, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll