header-logo header-logo

28 January 2010 / Vicky Regan , Dominic Regan
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

De-coding ACAS

Dominic Regan & Vicky Regan unpick the new disciplinary code

Dominic Regan & Vicky Regan unpick the new disciplinary code
Those vile statutory disciplinary procedures are now dead and gone. However, employers can still get it badly wrong under the new regime. The aim of this note is to take stock of the new position and to identify emerging difficulties.

The ACAS (Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service) Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures is now the source of prevailing wisdom. While its intention is to promote a more flexible formula to deal with problems in the workplace, uncertainty may arise when considering what actions are “reasonable” or “fair” when conducting disciplinary processes. While the areas of uncertainty will need to be clarified through case law, many of the requirements under the code mirror the repealed statutory regime.

With its emphasis on informal resolution the code, consisting of 45 paragraphs in total, provides a less prescriptive set of procedures that “should” be followed in any disciplinary process. The code is not legally binding, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll