header-logo header-logo

Deals reduction worries commercial firms

26 February 2009
Issue: 7358 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Commercial

Commercial law firms see the downturn in corporate work rather than a reduction in fees as the biggest threat to profitability.

A recent Sweet & Maxwell survey of finance directors at top 100 law firms revealed that 72% believe reduced mergers and acquistions and corporate finance related work posed a very significant risk to profitability, an increase of nearly a quarter from the 2008 survey when competition between firms over fees was seen as the greatest threat.

Only 12% of finance directors cited cost overruns on fixed fee work as a very significant risk (down from 36% in 2008). One respondent commented that while cost overruns were increasing, firms would rather take on work and risk not making a profit than have too many lawyers not working at all.

Commercial firms are also cracking down on late payments, after seeing large companies such as Woolworths and Lehman Brothers enter into administration.

However, the drop in corporate work has been tempered by an increase in litigation as the economic downturn triggers a rise in the number of commercial court cases. According to figures obtained by City fi rm Reynolds Porter Chamberlain, the number of high court commercial cases increased by 30% between 2005 and 2007.

Issue: 7358 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll