header-logo header-logo

25 February 2011
Issue: 7454 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Death knell for companies?

High fines anticipated for corporate manslaughter after first conviction

A company convicted of corporate manslaughter has been fi neda 116 per cent of its annual turnover. Cotswold Geotechnical Holdings Ltd (CGH) was fi ned £385,000 last week at Winchester Crown Court, after becoming the first to be convicted of the new off ence under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007.

A geologist working for CGH died in 2008 when a trench he was working in collapsed. Th e company was found to have breached health and safety legislation and ignored industry guidance. The company director, Peter Eaton, was previously charged with gross negligence manslaughter and a health and safety off ence, but was ruled too unwell to stand trial.

Gerard Forlin QC, of 2-3 Gray’s Inn Square, who specialises in health and safety law, says: “This company had a turnover in 2008 of £333,000 and was fined 116% of that. It was given a relatively long time to pay—ten years with £38,500 due each year. “I think companies are going to sit up and listen, as fines potentially have to be paid within 28 days according to the Sentencing Guidelines Council (SGC) guidance. In the context of its turnover, this is a high fine. If a fi ne of 116% were made against an oil company, large supermarket chain, bank or manufacturer then you can imagine the impact.

“However, each case willturn on its own facts and on the company’s ability to pay. I don’t think the court was sending out any particular message with this. It must be recalled that the SGC guidance set out the principles in any event.

“However, this case may well put the wind in the sails of the CPS and lead now to more prosecutions of larger organisations for corporate manslaughter.”

 Berrymans Lace Mawer LLP partner, Helen Devery says: “Although the fine is less than the starting point of £500,000 recommended by the SGC it will no doubt have a dramatic impact on a company of this size, refl ecting the trend towards harsher penalties.”

For more on this story see www.healthandsafetyatwork.com

Issue: 7454 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll