header-logo header-logo

Deciphering the code

11 August 2011 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter examine the award of uplifts in employment tribunals

The Employment Act 2002 (EA 2002) introduced the prospect of an uplift or reduction percentage to awards in relevant claims to encourage compliance with the relevant procedure. Although the disciplinary and grievance procedures contained within that Act have since been repealed, the principle still remains albeit now contained within section 207A of the Trade Union Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The “new” code, introduced in 2009, empowers the tribunal to adjust a relevant award by up to 25% if there has been an unreasonable failure to comply with the appropriate procedure.

Challenging terms

A recent research paper: Evaluation of the Acas Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures (2011, Nilufer Rahim, Ashley Brown and Jenny Graham (NatCen)), based on in-depth interviews of 36 employers, employees and their representatives, noted that terms used within the code, such as “reasonable”, were considered challenging to implement consistently and for this reason, “doubts were expressed about the accessibility of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll