header-logo header-logo

11 August 2011 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Deciphering the code

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter examine the award of uplifts in employment tribunals

The Employment Act 2002 (EA 2002) introduced the prospect of an uplift or reduction percentage to awards in relevant claims to encourage compliance with the relevant procedure. Although the disciplinary and grievance procedures contained within that Act have since been repealed, the principle still remains albeit now contained within section 207A of the Trade Union Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The “new” code, introduced in 2009, empowers the tribunal to adjust a relevant award by up to 25% if there has been an unreasonable failure to comply with the appropriate procedure.

Challenging terms

A recent research paper: Evaluation of the Acas Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures (2011, Nilufer Rahim, Ashley Brown and Jenny Graham (NatCen)), based on in-depth interviews of 36 employers, employees and their representatives, noted that terms used within the code, such as “reasonable”, were considered challenging to implement consistently and for this reason, “doubts were expressed about the accessibility of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll