header-logo header-logo

Defamation & ‘serious harm’ post Lachaux

11 July 2019 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7848 / Categories: Features , Defamation
printer mail-detail

Nicholas Dobson applauds the elegance of the judgment in Lachaux, which gives a much clearer basis for future consideration of potentially defamatory material

  • Section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013 raises the common law threshold of seriousness and requires its application to be determined by reference to actual facts and not merely to the meaning of material words.

Reputation has always been a precious commodity. Shakespeare knew this. So in Richard II, Mowbray, feeling ‘pierced to the soul with slander’s venomed spear’ pleaded passionately that ‘The purest treasure mortal times afford/Is spotless reputation.’ And Cassio in Othello mourned to evil Iago: ‘Reputation, reputation, reputation! O, I have lost my reputation, I have lost the immortal part of myself.’

So the law long recognised the need to protect reputation from unjustified assault. As Lord Sumption indicated, opening his elegant Supreme Court judgment on 12 June 2019 in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd and another [2019] UKSC 27, [2019] All ER (D) 42 (Jun): ‘The tort of defamation is an ancient construct

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll