header-logo header-logo

27 February 2014
Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Defence lawyers' "worst fears"

Criminal defence lawyers have expressed fury after the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) published its response to its controversial consultation on criminal legal aid.

Under the new proposals fees will be reduced by 6% and a new version of the Advocates Graduated Fees Scheme (AGFS) will be introduced—this will be reviewed after one year.

An unlimited number of own client contracts for solicitors will be allowed, while 525 duty contracts will be made available.

Duty solicitor fees will be reduced by 8.75% for cases starting after 20 March, with a further reduction planned for next year. While a a review will be held to look at ways to minimise the number of pre-trial hearings which require advocates to travel to and attend court—currently, barristers often receive as little as £80 for a pre-trial hearing from which they must pay their own travel.

Justice Secretary Chris Grayling said “more appropriate” fees would be paid in future to defence lawyers where a case is dropped, as well as interim payments during long trials, while extra information and support will be given to solicitors preparing for the new tender process. However, Nicholas Lavender QC, chair of the Bar Council, said the MoJ’s response “confirmed our worst fears”. “We are bitterly disappointed that, despite a sustained campaign emphasising that these proposals are contrary to the public interest, the government is pressing ahead with significant cuts to legal aid for advocacy in the Crown Court,” he said.

“These cuts are financially unnecessary, will cause significant damage to the justice system and to our international reputation for upholding the rule of law and will drive skilled and experienced advocates away from publicly-funded criminal work.”

Lavender said that, even before the current proposals, fees for Crown Court cases had been “savagely” cut by 21% on average since 2007 (a 37% cut in real terms). Defence lawyers have planned a second day of protest for 7 March, when they will boycott the courts. Criminal Bar chair, Nigel Lithman QC has also indicated he will call on senior members of the Bar to boycott Grayling’s flagship Magna Carta conference next year – which would be a serious embarrassment for the government.

The Law Society said it would support its members through the changes.

 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll