header-logo header-logo

Defence solicitors will refuse ‘uneconomic’ cases

27 May 2022
Issue: 7980 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail
Criminal law solicitors joined their colleagues at the Bar this week by taking action in protest at low legal aid fees

Following a 95% vote in favour, London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association (LCCSA) members are refusing to take on burglary instructions from 25 May. This is likely to result in magistrates’ court cases collapsing due to defendants being unable to access a lawyer.

Members may expand to other categories of ‘uneconomic’ cases in future, if demands are not met.

LCCSA president Hesham Puri said defence solicitors taking on low-paid cases like burglary ‘end up paying for the “privilege” to work. Our goodwill has run out.’

Puri said: ‘The public shouldn’t be fooled, there is no recovery plan for justice and the courts. There is no meaningful commitment to law and order.’

Meanwhile, the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) has said it may escalate its ‘no returns’ policy (https://bit.ly/3z1TxwD).

In a message to members this week, CBA chair Jo Sidhu QC said: ‘Over the last fortnight, we have received numerous emails and calls from criminal barristers at all levels of seniority expressing their dismay at the intransigence of government in the face of our concerted efforts to slow the progression of cases in the Crown Court.

‘The CBA has never ruled out an escalation of action if such a course is mandated by our membership. The recent feedback we have received from many members indicates a willingness and desire to adopt more disruptive forms of action in conjunction with the current strategy.’

Both solicitors and barristers want ministers to implement Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid chair, Sir Christopher Bellamy’s recommendations for an immediate increase of at least 15% in funding. In particular, the LCCSA is calling for a 25% increase in magistrates’ court fees and the CBA for a 25% increase in advocacy fees.

Issue: 7980 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll