header-logo header-logo

Defence solicitors will refuse ‘uneconomic’ cases

27 May 2022
Issue: 7980 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail
Criminal law solicitors joined their colleagues at the Bar this week by taking action in protest at low legal aid fees

Following a 95% vote in favour, London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association (LCCSA) members are refusing to take on burglary instructions from 25 May. This is likely to result in magistrates’ court cases collapsing due to defendants being unable to access a lawyer.

Members may expand to other categories of ‘uneconomic’ cases in future, if demands are not met.

LCCSA president Hesham Puri said defence solicitors taking on low-paid cases like burglary ‘end up paying for the “privilege” to work. Our goodwill has run out.’

Puri said: ‘The public shouldn’t be fooled, there is no recovery plan for justice and the courts. There is no meaningful commitment to law and order.’

Meanwhile, the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) has said it may escalate its ‘no returns’ policy (https://bit.ly/3z1TxwD).

In a message to members this week, CBA chair Jo Sidhu QC said: ‘Over the last fortnight, we have received numerous emails and calls from criminal barristers at all levels of seniority expressing their dismay at the intransigence of government in the face of our concerted efforts to slow the progression of cases in the Crown Court.

‘The CBA has never ruled out an escalation of action if such a course is mandated by our membership. The recent feedback we have received from many members indicates a willingness and desire to adopt more disruptive forms of action in conjunction with the current strategy.’

Both solicitors and barristers want ministers to implement Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid chair, Sir Christopher Bellamy’s recommendations for an immediate increase of at least 15% in funding. In particular, the LCCSA is calling for a 25% increase in magistrates’ court fees and the CBA for a 25% increase in advocacy fees.

Issue: 7980 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Commercial disputes practice bolstered by partner hire

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

London competition team expands with collective actions specialist hire

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Commercial dispute resolution team in London welcomes partner

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll