header-logo header-logo

Defending the troops?

05 October 2016
Issue: 7717 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers have criticised plans to introduce a presumption to derogate from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in future conflicts.

The prime minister and the defence secretary vowed this week to “protect our Armed Forces from persistent legal claims”. They said a series of court judgments over the past decade have extended the extra-territorial jurisdiction of the ECHR to the battlefield.

However, Martha Spurrier, director of Liberty, said derogation would “leave abuse victims unprotected and our troops powerless when the state fails to keep them safe from harm”.

Law Society president Robert Bourns said genuine claims could be put at risk, including those brought by soldiers against the Ministry of Defence.

The Geneva Conventions on armed conflict, service law and criminal law would continue to apply.

Public Interest Lawyers, which brought thousands of claims against the Armed Forces, closed after the Legal Aid Agency terminated its contract in August, citing breach of contractual requirements. 

Issue: 7717 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll