header-logo header-logo

Defending the troops?

05 October 2016
Issue: 7717 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers have criticised plans to introduce a presumption to derogate from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in future conflicts.

The prime minister and the defence secretary vowed this week to “protect our Armed Forces from persistent legal claims”. They said a series of court judgments over the past decade have extended the extra-territorial jurisdiction of the ECHR to the battlefield.

However, Martha Spurrier, director of Liberty, said derogation would “leave abuse victims unprotected and our troops powerless when the state fails to keep them safe from harm”.

Law Society president Robert Bourns said genuine claims could be put at risk, including those brought by soldiers against the Ministry of Defence.

The Geneva Conventions on armed conflict, service law and criminal law would continue to apply.

Public Interest Lawyers, which brought thousands of claims against the Armed Forces, closed after the Legal Aid Agency terminated its contract in August, citing breach of contractual requirements. 

Issue: 7717 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll