header-logo header-logo

05 October 2016
Issue: 7717 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Defending the troops?

Lawyers have criticised plans to introduce a presumption to derogate from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in future conflicts.

The prime minister and the defence secretary vowed this week to “protect our Armed Forces from persistent legal claims”. They said a series of court judgments over the past decade have extended the extra-territorial jurisdiction of the ECHR to the battlefield.

However, Martha Spurrier, director of Liberty, said derogation would “leave abuse victims unprotected and our troops powerless when the state fails to keep them safe from harm”.

Law Society president Robert Bourns said genuine claims could be put at risk, including those brought by soldiers against the Ministry of Defence.

The Geneva Conventions on armed conflict, service law and criminal law would continue to apply.

Public Interest Lawyers, which brought thousands of claims against the Armed Forces, closed after the Legal Aid Agency terminated its contract in August, citing breach of contractual requirements. 

Issue: 7717 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll