header-logo header-logo

05 October 2016
Issue: 7717 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Defending the troops?

Lawyers have criticised plans to introduce a presumption to derogate from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in future conflicts.

The prime minister and the defence secretary vowed this week to “protect our Armed Forces from persistent legal claims”. They said a series of court judgments over the past decade have extended the extra-territorial jurisdiction of the ECHR to the battlefield.

However, Martha Spurrier, director of Liberty, said derogation would “leave abuse victims unprotected and our troops powerless when the state fails to keep them safe from harm”.

Law Society president Robert Bourns said genuine claims could be put at risk, including those brought by soldiers against the Ministry of Defence.

The Geneva Conventions on armed conflict, service law and criminal law would continue to apply.

Public Interest Lawyers, which brought thousands of claims against the Armed Forces, closed after the Legal Aid Agency terminated its contract in August, citing breach of contractual requirements. 

Issue: 7717 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll