header-logo header-logo

Defining the United Kingdom

15 November 2018 / Paul Hewitt , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7817 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

​Paul Hewitt reports on how to resolve mistakes & ambiguities in wills & the fallout from a geographical error

  • Mistakes and ambiguities in wills are common. Such issues can usually be resolved with a minimum of drama, but sometimes, court intervention is required .

Sometimes a will does not reflect what the testator intended. This could be because of a mistake in the drafting, a mistake in understanding instructions, or simply because the grammar or choice of words is confusing. These mistakes usually only come to light when it is too late for the testator to correct them, because he or she has passed away. It is left to the competing beneficiaries to then argue as to what was intended and, in the more intractable situations, ask a judge to determine.

There are two main ways to resolve an ambiguity or put right a mistake in a will: construction and rectification. The usual way to resolve ambiguity is through a ‘construction application’, which asks the court to decide what the words

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll