header-logo header-logo

15 November 2018 / Paul Hewitt , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7817 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Defining the United Kingdom

​Paul Hewitt reports on how to resolve mistakes & ambiguities in wills & the fallout from a geographical error

  • Mistakes and ambiguities in wills are common. Such issues can usually be resolved with a minimum of drama, but sometimes, court intervention is required .

Sometimes a will does not reflect what the testator intended. This could be because of a mistake in the drafting, a mistake in understanding instructions, or simply because the grammar or choice of words is confusing. These mistakes usually only come to light when it is too late for the testator to correct them, because he or she has passed away. It is left to the competing beneficiaries to then argue as to what was intended and, in the more intractable situations, ask a judge to determine.

There are two main ways to resolve an ambiguity or put right a mistake in a will: construction and rectification. The usual way to resolve ambiguity is through a ‘construction application’, which asks the court to decide what the words

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll