header-logo header-logo

15 November 2018 / Paul Hewitt , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7817 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Defining the United Kingdom

​Paul Hewitt reports on how to resolve mistakes & ambiguities in wills & the fallout from a geographical error

  • Mistakes and ambiguities in wills are common. Such issues can usually be resolved with a minimum of drama, but sometimes, court intervention is required .

Sometimes a will does not reflect what the testator intended. This could be because of a mistake in the drafting, a mistake in understanding instructions, or simply because the grammar or choice of words is confusing. These mistakes usually only come to light when it is too late for the testator to correct them, because he or she has passed away. It is left to the competing beneficiaries to then argue as to what was intended and, in the more intractable situations, ask a judge to determine.

There are two main ways to resolve an ambiguity or put right a mistake in a will: construction and rectification. The usual way to resolve ambiguity is through a ‘construction application’, which asks the court to decide what the words

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll