header-logo header-logo

Defining the United Kingdom

15 November 2018 / Paul Hewitt , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7817 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

​Paul Hewitt reports on how to resolve mistakes & ambiguities in wills & the fallout from a geographical error

  • Mistakes and ambiguities in wills are common. Such issues can usually be resolved with a minimum of drama, but sometimes, court intervention is required .

Sometimes a will does not reflect what the testator intended. This could be because of a mistake in the drafting, a mistake in understanding instructions, or simply because the grammar or choice of words is confusing. These mistakes usually only come to light when it is too late for the testator to correct them, because he or she has passed away. It is left to the competing beneficiaries to then argue as to what was intended and, in the more intractable situations, ask a judge to determine.

There are two main ways to resolve an ambiguity or put right a mistake in a will: construction and rectification. The usual way to resolve ambiguity is through a ‘construction application’, which asks the court to decide what the words

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll