header-logo header-logo

Delay & Covid: the court’s power to reduce sentence

01 October 2021 / Andrew Morris
Issue: 7950 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Criminal
printer mail-detail
59349
Andrew Morris considers the impact of delays on both charge & trial on sentencing
  • Delay between arrest and charge and charge and trial. Effect of delay on sentence and whether this should afford a reduction to the overall tariff.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a dramatic effect on the business of the criminal courts, in particular the Crown Court’s capacity to carry on with its main business, which is the administration of jury trials. By their very nature, the trial process in the Crown Court involves the movement of ‘jury pools’ around the Crown Court building, and jurors sitting in close proximity to each other and deliberating in small rooms or spaces.

Those within the profession as advocates in the Crown and magistrate’s courts have been well aware of the backlogs that already existed before the pandemic. The latest figures released by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) are in excess of 50,000 cases, much of which was already an issue due to the reduction in sitting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll