header-logo header-logo

Delay & Covid: the court’s power to reduce sentence

01 October 2021 / Andrew Morris
Issue: 7950 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Criminal
printer mail-detail
59349
Andrew Morris considers the impact of delays on both charge & trial on sentencing
  • Delay between arrest and charge and charge and trial. Effect of delay on sentence and whether this should afford a reduction to the overall tariff.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a dramatic effect on the business of the criminal courts, in particular the Crown Court’s capacity to carry on with its main business, which is the administration of jury trials. By their very nature, the trial process in the Crown Court involves the movement of ‘jury pools’ around the Crown Court building, and jurors sitting in close proximity to each other and deliberating in small rooms or spaces.

Those within the profession as advocates in the Crown and magistrate’s courts have been well aware of the backlogs that already existed before the pandemic. The latest figures released by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) are in excess of 50,000 cases, much of which was already an issue due to the reduction in sitting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

Gloucestershire firm boosts residential conveyancing team

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

Firm strengthens corporate team in Worcester with new hire

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

Weightmans partner appointed president of London Market Forum of Insurance Lawyers

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll