header-logo header-logo

01 October 2021 / Andrew Morris
Issue: 7950 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Delay & Covid: the court’s power to reduce sentence

59349
Andrew Morris considers the impact of delays on both charge & trial on sentencing
  • Delay between arrest and charge and charge and trial. Effect of delay on sentence and whether this should afford a reduction to the overall tariff.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a dramatic effect on the business of the criminal courts, in particular the Crown Court’s capacity to carry on with its main business, which is the administration of jury trials. By their very nature, the trial process in the Crown Court involves the movement of ‘jury pools’ around the Crown Court building, and jurors sitting in close proximity to each other and deliberating in small rooms or spaces.

Those within the profession as advocates in the Crown and magistrate’s courts have been well aware of the backlogs that already existed before the pandemic. The latest figures released by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) are in excess of 50,000 cases, much of which was already an issue due to the reduction in sitting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll