header-logo header-logo

27 March 2019
Issue: 7834 / Categories: Legal News , Professional negligence , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Delays & negligence in the NHS

The recent suggestion from some commentators that delays in NHS treatment for elective care and cancer treatment could spark an increase in negligence claims ‘is not completely straightforward’, according to law firm Roythornes.

The National Audit Office last week published a report showing treatment times fall short of NHS targets, prompting the suggestions.

Roythornes pointed out that, while negligence could be argued if the targets are recognised as accepted practice, the NHS could justify the departure from accepted practice on the basis of financial constraints. Moreover, the accepted standards could change with time if it becomes apparent the targets are unreasonable.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

From childhood dreams of the Bar to some of the country's most challenging cases, Maryam Syed KC explains why she has never stopped standing up for others

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft significantly expands Cyber team, hiring three Cyber partners

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson appoints senior healthcare leader Professor Clive Kay as strategic adviser

NEWS
As family justice moves further away from the courtroom, collaborative law is emerging as an increasingly important route to resolving separation disputes
A busy period for employment law is producing important lessons for employers, employees and tribunals alike
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll