header-logo header-logo

Delays & negligence in the NHS

27 March 2019
Issue: 7834 / Categories: Legal News , Professional negligence , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

The recent suggestion from some commentators that delays in NHS treatment for elective care and cancer treatment could spark an increase in negligence claims ‘is not completely straightforward’, according to law firm Roythornes.

The National Audit Office last week published a report showing treatment times fall short of NHS targets, prompting the suggestions.

Roythornes pointed out that, while negligence could be argued if the targets are recognised as accepted practice, the NHS could justify the departure from accepted practice on the basis of financial constraints. Moreover, the accepted standards could change with time if it becomes apparent the targets are unreasonable.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll