header-logo header-logo

21 November 2018
Issue: 7818 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Delegated powers under scrutiny

The government’s ‘escalating’ use of delegated powers instead of primary legislation is ‘constitutionally objectional’, peers have said.

A report by the House of Lords Constitution Committee, published this week, states: ‘It has become increasingly apparent that the determining factor as to whether to include a delegated power in a bill is whether Parliament will accept the delegation, rather than any point of principle. We find this disturbing.’

The government came under fire for its use of Henry VIII powers—clauses that permit ministers to amend or repeal provisions in an Act with less scrutiny through the use of secondary legislation—in the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018. The peers also hit out at ‘skeleton bills’ such as the Childcare Bill where policy details are filled in at a later date.

Committee chair, Baroness Taylor of Bolton, said Parliament could begin to reject secondary legislation ‘if the government persists in the inappropriate use of delegated powers’.

Issue: 7818 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll