header-logo header-logo

10 May 2023
Issue: 8024 / Categories: Legal News , Health & safety , Regulatory , National Health Service
printer mail-detail

Dentist cleared of mixing NHS & private work

A dentist did not breach regulations when she mixed NHS and private work on the same tooth, the Court of Appeal has held.

Lucy Williams provided three patients with a crown on the NHS and a ceramic crown for an additional private top-up fee of between £35 and £65. The professional conduct committee held the dentist acted in breach of regulations, was dishonest in so doing, and struck her off the register.

In General Dental Council v Williams [2023] EWCA Civ 481, however, the Court of Appeal held the NHS Contracts Regulations do not prevent dentists from charging a top-up fee to provide a better looking crown. Moreover, the court held the finding of dishonesty should never have been made.

Tania Francis, partner at Hempsons, which acted for Williams, said: ‘Of importance to the profession, the Court of Appeal found that these top-up fees are allowed by the regulations and indeed are much closer to the spirit of NHS dentistry than the [General Dental Council]’s interpretation.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll