header-logo header-logo

10 May 2023
Issue: 8024 / Categories: Legal News , Health & safety , Regulatory , National Health Service
printer mail-detail

Dentist cleared of mixing NHS & private work

A dentist did not breach regulations when she mixed NHS and private work on the same tooth, the Court of Appeal has held.

Lucy Williams provided three patients with a crown on the NHS and a ceramic crown for an additional private top-up fee of between £35 and £65. The professional conduct committee held the dentist acted in breach of regulations, was dishonest in so doing, and struck her off the register.

In General Dental Council v Williams [2023] EWCA Civ 481, however, the Court of Appeal held the NHS Contracts Regulations do not prevent dentists from charging a top-up fee to provide a better looking crown. Moreover, the court held the finding of dishonesty should never have been made.

Tania Francis, partner at Hempsons, which acted for Williams, said: ‘Of importance to the profession, the Court of Appeal found that these top-up fees are allowed by the regulations and indeed are much closer to the spirit of NHS dentistry than the [General Dental Council]’s interpretation.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll