header-logo header-logo

The deposit! Don't let this happen to your client

30 May 2014 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Alec Samuels provides some points of reference for trouble-free conveyancing

In the usual situation the deposit is paid by the purchaser P to the vendor V on the exchange of contracts, and the transaction runs smoothly. Complications may arise where, as a term of the contract, V (or P) has to obtain planning permission or V has to build the flat and make it ready for occupation. When the planning permission will be issued is uncertain until it happens; when the flat will be ready is uncertain until it happens. The deposit was to be paid 60 days after planning permission was obtained. Planning permission was obtained. V then served a five-day notice making time of the essence and requiring payment of the deposit. P did not pay.

The Court of Appeal held that as a matter of law the payment of the deposit is a condition of the contract, a fundamental term. The five-day notice was fair and reasonable, and made time of the essence. Failure by P to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll