header-logo header-logo

17 February 2017
Issue: 7734 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Deposit release

On the hearing of a residential property possession claim, can the court order the deposit protector to release the deposit to the claimant landlord on account of a judgment for rent arrears and without the consent of the defendant tenant and the protector?

The court often does and the protectors seem content to comply with such an order although there does not appear to be any express authority for such an order. If the tenant is present at the hearing, our experience is that they invariably consent. The argument against is that the deposit should remain protected until the tenancy comes to an end but this can be met by provision that the deposit is not released until the landlord certifies that the tenant has vacated.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll