header-logo header-logo

Deputy PM is right on

02 September 2011
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Courts must rise above human rights “paranoia” says Clegg

Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg has mounted a staunch defence of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) and the decisions of the courts, ahead of the UK taking over the chairmanship of the Council of Europe in November.

Writing in The Guardian last week, Clegg said incorporating the European Convention on Human Rights into domestic law had been “a hugely positive step”, reducing delays for litigants and sending a message about the value the UK places on human rights.

A future Bill of Rights should be used to “deepen our commitment” to the protections of HRA 1998 and to protect “other British liberties, such as the right to jury trial”. The government would use its chairmanship to seek reforms to “improve the timeliness and consistency” of the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR) decision-making.

A myth had taken root that human rights were “a charter for greedy lawyers and meddlesome bureaucrats”, he wrote, blaming “overcautious lawyers and officials” for creating a “culture of legal paranoia”.

Clegg also listed some of the courts’ achievements, including preventing local authorities from snooping on families and upholding the rights of elderly married couples to be cared for together in care homes.

Prime Minister David Cameron has frequently called for HRA 1998 to be repealed, while MPs across the parties have expressed fury at a ECtHR ruling that Britain’s blanket ban on prisoners voting is unlawful.

Liberty director Shami Chakrabarti said: “This is a welcome intervention from the deputy prime minister and certainly not before time.

“The coalition was stitched together on a civil liberties ticket. You can’t talk human rights in the Arab spring whilst trashing them at home all year round.”

See further, the recent NLJ series on human rights by Roger Smith, director of Justice:

The State of Human Rights (1), (2), (3), (4)

Issue: 7479 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll