header-logo header-logo

27 March 2026 / Ann Stanyer
Issue: 8155 / Categories: Features , Court of Protection , Property
printer mail-detail

Deputyship & trust corporations

245634
Ann Stanyer reports on a recent decision clarifying how trust corporations may be appointed as deputies, & the safeguards the court expects before approving them
  • The Court of Protection confirmed that Category 3 (unregulated) trust corporations can be appointed as deputies, but only with strict safeguards and undertakings.
  • The court stressed the need for adequate insurance and transparency with the Public Guardian.

The Court of Protection has recently authorised the use of a new category of trust corporation to act as deputy appointed by that court. It is instructive to review how the court reached this decision.

Re Various Incapacitated Persons

The case of Re Various Incapacitated Persons [2018] EWCOP 3 involved an application for 36 different persons for the appointment of property and affairs deputies of a trust corporation. The court had to consider whether a trust corporation was a fit and proper legal person to hold such an appointment. The court acknowledged the benefits of appointing a trust corporation to be a deputy. These, it said, included:

  • ‘Continuity:
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll