header-logo header-logo

Destination settle: keeping on track

05 July 2024 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 8078 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs , Privacy
printer mail-detail
180611
If the destination is settlement, parties are advised to get on board at the earliest (& cheapest) opportunity, says Dominic Regan
  • Covers the benefits of making compliant Pt 36 offers, including notable cases involving late settlement.

Judges do not want to judge. They would much prefer parties to settle. It might be an oversimplification, but a trial will generally produce a winner and a loser. The winner will invariably be out of pocket because not all of their legal expenditure will be recoverable. Far better, holds the prevailing view of our senior judiciary, that a settlement bargain is struck. Sir Geoffrey Vos MR and Lord Justice Birss are passionate about alternative dispute resolution. Indeed, Sir Geoffrey wrote the Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil CBC [2023] EWCA Civ 1416, [2023] All ER (D) 04 (Dec) judgment last autumn, which unanimously declared that judges could order parties to engage in ADR. To be on the safe side, Rules of Court are coming under the guidance of Lady Justice Asplin so that ADR will

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll