header-logo header-logo

06 February 2026 / Victoria Rylatt , Robyn Laye
Issue: 8148 / Categories: Features , Family , Child law , Abuse , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Determining the facts in family disputes

241913
Victoria Rylatt & Robyn Laye report on recent issues that have arisen in fact-finding hearings
  • This article examines issues that have arisen recently in fact-finding hearings in private law proceedings.
  • It highlights how courts address disputed allegations of domestic abuse, and the procedural and evidential challenges involved.

In fact-finding hearings, there is a need for structured analysis, clear reasoning and evidence-based decision-making to safeguard children’s welfare while ensuring fairness and maintaining the integrity of the proceedings, as shown in the following recent cases.

X v Y

In X v Y [2025] EWFC 291 (B), the mother had made allegations of domestic abuse against the father. The court ordered the parties to file statements addressing the allegations so that it could determine whether a fact-finding hearing was necessary. The court at an earlier hearing recorded that ‘a fact-finding hearing may not be needed because the allegations of abuse are unclear and may be largely historic and have not prevented contact taking place previously’.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll