header-logo header-logo

06 February 2026 / Victoria Rylatt , Robyn Laye
Issue: 8148 / Categories: Features , Family , Child law , Abuse , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Determining the facts in family disputes

241913
Victoria Rylatt & Robyn Laye report on recent issues that have arisen in fact-finding hearings
  • This article examines issues that have arisen recently in fact-finding hearings in private law proceedings.
  • It highlights how courts address disputed allegations of domestic abuse, and the procedural and evidential challenges involved.

In fact-finding hearings, there is a need for structured analysis, clear reasoning and evidence-based decision-making to safeguard children’s welfare while ensuring fairness and maintaining the integrity of the proceedings, as shown in the following recent cases.

X v Y

In X v Y [2025] EWFC 291 (B), the mother had made allegations of domestic abuse against the father. The court ordered the parties to file statements addressing the allegations so that it could determine whether a fact-finding hearing was necessary. The court at an earlier hearing recorded that ‘a fact-finding hearing may not be needed because the allegations of abuse are unclear and may be largely historic and have not prevented contact taking place previously’.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll