header-logo header-logo

Determining the facts in family disputes

06 February 2026 / Victoria Rylatt , Robyn Laye
Issue: 8148 / Categories: Features , Family , Child law , Abuse , Divorce
printer mail-detail
241913
Victoria Rylatt & Robyn Laye report on recent issues that have arisen in fact-finding hearings
  • This article examines issues that have arisen recently in fact-finding hearings in private law proceedings.
  • It highlights how courts address disputed allegations of domestic abuse, and the procedural and evidential challenges involved.

In fact-finding hearings, there is a need for structured analysis, clear reasoning and evidence-based decision-making to safeguard children’s welfare while ensuring fairness and maintaining the integrity of the proceedings, as shown in the following recent cases.

X v Y

In X v Y [2025] EWFC 291 (B), the mother had made allegations of domestic abuse against the father. The court ordered the parties to file statements addressing the allegations so that it could determine whether a fact-finding hearing was necessary. The court at an earlier hearing recorded that ‘a fact-finding hearing may not be needed because the allegations of abuse are unclear and may be largely historic and have not prevented contact taking place previously’.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—Ed Williams

DWF—Ed Williams

Public sector disputes capability bolstered by partner hire in Leeds

Blake Morgan—Scott Hilton, Joan Yu & Melia Hirst

Blake Morgan—Scott Hilton, Joan Yu & Melia Hirst

Firm strengthens corporate, real estate and insolvency teams with partner trio

Seddons GSC—David Seal & Emma Clifford

Seddons GSC—David Seal & Emma Clifford

Consultant and solicitor join commercial real estate team

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll