header-logo header-logo

06 February 2026 / Victoria Rylatt , Robyn Laye
Issue: 8148 / Categories: Features , Family , Child law , Abuse , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Determining the facts in family disputes

241913
Victoria Rylatt & Robyn Laye report on recent issues that have arisen in fact-finding hearings
  • This article examines issues that have arisen recently in fact-finding hearings in private law proceedings.
  • It highlights how courts address disputed allegations of domestic abuse, and the procedural and evidential challenges involved.

In fact-finding hearings, there is a need for structured analysis, clear reasoning and evidence-based decision-making to safeguard children’s welfare while ensuring fairness and maintaining the integrity of the proceedings, as shown in the following recent cases.

X v Y

In X v Y [2025] EWFC 291 (B), the mother had made allegations of domestic abuse against the father. The court ordered the parties to file statements addressing the allegations so that it could determine whether a fact-finding hearing was necessary. The court at an earlier hearing recorded that ‘a fact-finding hearing may not be needed because the allegations of abuse are unclear and may be largely historic and have not prevented contact taking place previously’.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll