Developments in group litigation: a more flexible approach?

28 April 2023 / David Pickstone , Darren Kidd , Alexander Lerner

Issue: 8022 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Collective action , CPR

David Pickstone, Darren Kidd & Alexander Lerner examine some positive signs for CPR 19.6 & the future of collective proceedings in England and Wales

Considers the recent High Court judgment in Commission Recovery Ltd v Marks & Clerk LLP, which permitted a claimant pursuing a claim in respect of secret commissions to proceed on behalf of itself and clients and former clients of one of the defendants on an ‘opt out’ basis.
The judgment demonstrated the flexibility of CPR 19.6, and noted the importance of legislative intervention to develop this area of law and thereby put England and Wales at the forefront of global collective redress.

The decision of the High Court in Commission Recovery Ltd v Marks & Clerk LLP and another [2023] EWHC 398 (Comm) represented the first significant judicial analysis of the ‘same interest’ test in CPR 19.6 since Lloyd v Google [2021] UKSC 50. The decision may mark a significant departure from the court’s historically restrictive

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Developments in group litigation: a more flexible approach?

David Pickstone, Darren Kidd & Alexander Lerner examine some positive signs for CPR 19.6 & the future of collective proceedings in England and Wales

Considers the recent High Court judgment in Commission Recovery Ltd v Marks & Clerk LLP, which permitted a claimant pursuing a claim in respect of secret commissions to proceed on behalf of itself and clients and former clients of one of the defendants on an ‘opt out’ basis.
The judgment demonstrated the flexibility of CPR 19.6, and noted the importance of legislative intervention to develop this area of law and thereby put England and Wales at the forefront of global collective redress.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Motor commissions & fiduciary duties

The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings

NLJ this week: The power of Interpol red notices

Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Approach with caution post-Mazur

Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?

Philip Sales is selected as next Deputy President

Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year

Tax shock ahead for partners?

Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget

Error message

Developments in group litigation: a more flexible approach?

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington