header-logo header-logo

12 March 2019 / David Wolchover
Issue: 7832 / Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Did activating Article 50 constitute an indictable offence?

Brexit countdown alarm clock
Was the prime minister’s triggering of Art 50 wilfully unconstitutional, and did it therefore amount to misconduct in public office? David Wolchover puts forward the case
 

During the years of the coalition government, Prime Minister David Cameron was much exercised by his desire to reverse the growing popularity of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP), to achieve some degree of harmony and peace within the Conservative Party over the issue of the UK’s membership of the European Union, and to consolidate his own position. The solution was to give pride of place in the party’s 2015 election manifesto to the promise of a referendum on continued EU membership.

Having won the election, the new Conservative government immediately set about making legislative provision for the referendum, enacting the European Union Referendum Act 2015 (EURA 2015). The poll was held on 23 June 2016, and of those who cast a vote, 51.89% opted for leave, while 48.11% chose remain. Although the turnout was a relatively high 72%,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Kennedy

DWF—David Kennedy

DWF appoints new major injury and casualty partner in Dublin

Keystone Law—12 appointments

Keystone Law—12 appointments

Keystone Law reinforces full-service offering with 12 partner appointments

Haynes Boone—Linton Bloomberg

Haynes Boone—Linton Bloomberg

Linton Bloomberg joins Haynes Boone's London office, expanding cross-border restructuring capabilities

NEWS
Sole practitioners and small firms are struggling due to the pressure of recruitment issues and excessive regulation, the Law Society has warned
Pressure is mounting for a dedicated UK AI law, but deciding what it should achieve remains the central challenge
Legal professional privilege has checked the SRA’s investigative powers, exposing difficult questions about tackling suspected abusive litigation
Refusing mediation need not trigger a costs penalty, but litigators must justify their position
Group claims, disputed costs and judicial recruitment dominate the latest courtroom round-up
back-to-top-scroll