header-logo header-logo

12 March 2019 / David Wolchover
Issue: 7832 / Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Did activating Article 50 constitute an indictable offence?

Brexit countdown alarm clock
Was the prime minister’s triggering of Art 50 wilfully unconstitutional, and did it therefore amount to misconduct in public office? David Wolchover puts forward the case
 

During the years of the coalition government, Prime Minister David Cameron was much exercised by his desire to reverse the growing popularity of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP), to achieve some degree of harmony and peace within the Conservative Party over the issue of the UK’s membership of the European Union, and to consolidate his own position. The solution was to give pride of place in the party’s 2015 election manifesto to the promise of a referendum on continued EU membership.

Having won the election, the new Conservative government immediately set about making legislative provision for the referendum, enacting the European Union Referendum Act 2015 (EURA 2015). The poll was held on 23 June 2016, and of those who cast a vote, 51.89% opted for leave, while 48.11% chose remain. Although the turnout was a relatively high 72%,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll