header-logo header-logo

Did activating Article 50 constitute an indictable offence?

12 March 2019 / David Wolchover
Issue: 7832 / Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail
Brexit countdown alarm clock
Was the prime minister’s triggering of Art 50 wilfully unconstitutional, and did it therefore amount to misconduct in public office? David Wolchover puts forward the case
 

During the years of the coalition government, Prime Minister David Cameron was much exercised by his desire to reverse the growing popularity of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP), to achieve some degree of harmony and peace within the Conservative Party over the issue of the UK’s membership of the European Union, and to consolidate his own position. The solution was to give pride of place in the party’s 2015 election manifesto to the promise of a referendum on continued EU membership.

Having won the election, the new Conservative government immediately set about making legislative provision for the referendum, enacting the European Union Referendum Act 2015 (EURA 2015). The poll was held on 23 June 2016, and of those who cast a vote, 51.89% opted for leave, while 48.11% chose remain. Although the turnout was a relatively high 72%,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates

mfg Solicitors—Philip Chapman

mfg Solicitors—Philip Chapman

Regional firm strengthens corporate team with partner hire

Switalskis—Sally Christey, Mathew Abiagom & Cyman Kaur

Switalskis—Sally Christey, Mathew Abiagom & Cyman Kaur

Commercial property team expands with trio of appointments

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll