header-logo header-logo

22 September 2021
Issue: 7949 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Digital assets after life

Estates and probate practitioners have called for bereaved families to be given better support in accessing their loved ones’ digital assets when they die or become incapacitated

STEP, a global body of estates and probate practitioners, and Queen Mary University of London’s Cloud Legal Project, published a report this week, ‘Digital assets: a call to action’, highlighting families’ concerns about digital assets such as social media accounts, photos and emails.

The report’s authors call on legislators to put in place much clearer rules on property rights and rights of access by personal representatives, and on cloud providers to meet with inheritance planning experts to find more effective solutions for post-mortem account access.

Out of 500 practitioners surveyed for the report, nearly 60% have had clients concerned about digital assets, and 90% expect these concerns to increase.

Clients’ questions mostly concern social media, email, cryptocurrencies and cloud storage. The top five providers of cloud services mentioned by clients were Apple, Google, Facebook, Microsoft and Dropbox.

Nearly one quarter of the practitioners have had clients who experienced difficulties accessing their loved one’s digital assets, causing significant distress and frustration. They highlighted a lack of legal clarity about property rights. One in five respondents reported an uncooperative attitude from service providers where accounts could not be accessed.

Only six per cent of practitioners thought the process for accessing digital assets stored in the cloud was straightforward. More than 85% wanted cloud providers to provide better ways to manage access after death or incapacity.

Emily Deane, technical counsel at STEP, said: ‘In just a few short years, digital assets have become fundamental to many aspects of our lives. STEP and its members want to see better engagement from governments and service providers globally so that families can plan for their futures with certainty and clarity.’

The Law Commission is currently reviewing the property status of digital assets in English law.

 

Issue: 7949 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll