header-logo header-logo

Digital justice for all

226810
Professors Sue Prince & Liz Smart explain why inclusion must be at the heart of reform to improve access to justice
  • As digital technology replaces paper-based court processes, it is important to consider development from the perspective of those who use the courts, and to change the language from digital disadvantage to digital inclusion.

The Law Society reports that between 2010 and 2019, almost half the courts in England and Wales were closed. Those that remain have faced significant resourcing challenges, such as reducing judicial sitting hours and the opening hours of public counters.

In response to some of these issues, in 2016, HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) began a £1.2bn court modernisation programme. This programme was supported by the senior judiciary in the document ‘Transforming Our Justice System’. Court modernisation expanded and developed digital court services, replacing some of the traditional, paper-based processes with online and digital, such as the development of the Online Civil Money Claims portal for many small

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll