header-logo header-logo

Digital justice for all

226810
Professors Sue Prince & Liz Smart explain why inclusion must be at the heart of reform to improve access to justice
  • As digital technology replaces paper-based court processes, it is important to consider development from the perspective of those who use the courts, and to change the language from digital disadvantage to digital inclusion.

The Law Society reports that between 2010 and 2019, almost half the courts in England and Wales were closed. Those that remain have faced significant resourcing challenges, such as reducing judicial sitting hours and the opening hours of public counters.

In response to some of these issues, in 2016, HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) began a £1.2bn court modernisation programme. This programme was supported by the senior judiciary in the document ‘Transforming Our Justice System’. Court modernisation expanded and developed digital court services, replacing some of the traditional, paper-based processes with online and digital, such as the development of the Online Civil Money Claims portal for many small

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll