header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Digital law crashes out…for now

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
27 April 2017 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7743 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail
nlj_7743_hynes

Will a poor return on investment derail robot lawyers? Steve Hynes reports

Heralded as the future of legal services, Rechtwijzer 2.0, the digital family law service, looks like it is coming to an ignominious end. The Dutch organisation behind the product, the Hague Institute for the Internationalisation of Law (HiiL), is pulling the plug on it as it is not making enough cash.

Game changer

Three years ago Roger Smith, the NLJ columnist and expert on innovation in legal aid policy, described Rechtwijzer as a ‘game changer’ as it was setting ‘a new standard for what can be delivered’ through new technology. This first version he was referring to, hosted by the Dutch Legal Aid Board, provided information and interactive pathways through dealing with consumer problems and relationship breakdowns. Information only was given on other civil legal problems.

The Rechtwijzer 2.0 product was launched in 2015. This was intended to provide a web-based interactive negotiated settlement service for separating couples. According to Smith there was ‘fairly good usage’ of the service after its

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Read All
Public Accounts Committee warn of ‘extinction’ risk for legal aid
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
NLJ this week: The insider returns
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
NLJ this week: Drawing the line on contempt
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
NLJ this week: Stop and search by the numbers
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
NLJ this week: Looking back on the prorogation that never was
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll