header-logo header-logo

Digital markets law boosts potential for private claims

15 November 2024 / Annabel Elliott
Issue: 8094 / Categories: Features , Competition
printer mail-detail
196796
Annabel Elliott investigates new causes of action & forms of relief in competition law disputes
  • The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 introduces new causes of action for private litigants against firms operating in digital markets designated as having ‘strategic market status’.
  • This may cause a rethink in how competition claims have traditionally been brought against such firms.
  • The Act also introduces new forms of relief for competition claims, further bolstering the litigation landscape for claimants.

The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCCA 2024 2024) received Royal Assent earlier this year. Deservedly, much focus has been on the Competition and Market Authority’s (CMA’s) enhanced statutory powers when it comes to the enforcement of competition law in digital markets. However, beyond the new regime in the regulation of digital markets, the DMCCA 2024 will also have an effect on the competition litigation landscape in England and Wales, an area of private litigation that has seen enormous growth in recent years with the advent of the collective

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll