header-logo header-logo

15 November 2024 / Annabel Elliott
Issue: 8094 / Categories: Features , Competition
printer mail-detail

Digital markets law boosts potential for private claims

196796
Annabel Elliott investigates new causes of action & forms of relief in competition law disputes
  • The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 introduces new causes of action for private litigants against firms operating in digital markets designated as having ‘strategic market status’.
  • This may cause a rethink in how competition claims have traditionally been brought against such firms.
  • The Act also introduces new forms of relief for competition claims, further bolstering the litigation landscape for claimants.

The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCCA 2024 2024) received Royal Assent earlier this year. Deservedly, much focus has been on the Competition and Market Authority’s (CMA’s) enhanced statutory powers when it comes to the enforcement of competition law in digital markets. However, beyond the new regime in the regulation of digital markets, the DMCCA 2024 will also have an effect on the competition litigation landscape in England and Wales, an area of private litigation that has seen enormous growth in recent years with the advent of the collective

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll