header-logo header-logo

Digital markets law boosts potential for private claims

15 November 2024 / Annabel Elliott
Issue: 8094 / Categories: Features , Competition
printer mail-detail
196796
Annabel Elliott investigates new causes of action & forms of relief in competition law disputes
  • The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 introduces new causes of action for private litigants against firms operating in digital markets designated as having ‘strategic market status’.
  • This may cause a rethink in how competition claims have traditionally been brought against such firms.
  • The Act also introduces new forms of relief for competition claims, further bolstering the litigation landscape for claimants.

The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCCA 2024 2024) received Royal Assent earlier this year. Deservedly, much focus has been on the Competition and Market Authority’s (CMA’s) enhanced statutory powers when it comes to the enforcement of competition law in digital markets. However, beyond the new regime in the regulation of digital markets, the DMCCA 2024 will also have an effect on the competition litigation landscape in England and Wales, an area of private litigation that has seen enormous growth in recent years with the advent of the collective

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll