header-logo header-logo

19 July 2007 / Patrick Beale
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Directors beware?

Can directors mitigate the increased risk of claims under CA 2006? asks Patrick Beale

On 1 October 2007, the provisions of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) governing directors’ duties and the rights of shareholders to bring claims against directors in the name of the company (so-called derivative claims) will come into force. Concern has been expressed that the changes will expose directors to increased litigation.

The effect of the directors’ duties under CA 2006 (see box on p 1034) is cumulative so that where more than one duty applies, a director must comply with each applicable duty. So, for example, the duty to promote the success of the company will not excuse a director from a breach of the duty to act within his powers, even if he considers that it would most likely promote the success of the company.

The most significant change is the duty to promote the success of the company for the benefit of members as a whole. The meaning of this phrase is not devoid of uncertainty. “Success” in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll