header-logo header-logo

19 July 2007 / Patrick Beale
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Directors beware?

Can directors mitigate the increased risk of claims under CA 2006? asks Patrick Beale

On 1 October 2007, the provisions of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) governing directors’ duties and the rights of shareholders to bring claims against directors in the name of the company (so-called derivative claims) will come into force. Concern has been expressed that the changes will expose directors to increased litigation.

The effect of the directors’ duties under CA 2006 (see box on p 1034) is cumulative so that where more than one duty applies, a director must comply with each applicable duty. So, for example, the duty to promote the success of the company will not excuse a director from a breach of the duty to act within his powers, even if he considers that it would most likely promote the success of the company.

The most significant change is the duty to promote the success of the company for the benefit of members as a whole. The meaning of this phrase is not devoid of uncertainty. “Success” in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll