header-logo header-logo

19 July 2007 / Patrick Beale
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Directors beware?

Can directors mitigate the increased risk of claims under CA 2006? asks Patrick Beale

On 1 October 2007, the provisions of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) governing directors’ duties and the rights of shareholders to bring claims against directors in the name of the company (so-called derivative claims) will come into force. Concern has been expressed that the changes will expose directors to increased litigation.

The effect of the directors’ duties under CA 2006 (see box on p 1034) is cumulative so that where more than one duty applies, a director must comply with each applicable duty. So, for example, the duty to promote the success of the company will not excuse a director from a breach of the duty to act within his powers, even if he considers that it would most likely promote the success of the company.

The most significant change is the duty to promote the success of the company for the benefit of members as a whole. The meaning of this phrase is not devoid of uncertainty. “Success” in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll