header-logo header-logo

20 October 2017
Issue: 7766 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Disciplinary standard of proof under review

Solicitors have been asked for their views on expected proposals regarding the standard of proof for the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT).

In a discussion paper published this week, the Law Society says the SDT is expected to review the standard of proof it applies later this year, as part of a wider consultation on the Solicitors Disciplinary Proceedings Rules 2007.

Currently, the SDT applies the civil standard of proof, ‘on the balance of probabilities’.

However, the Law Society argues that it should revert to its pre-2010 position of using the criminal standard of ‘beyond reasonable doubt’, as a solicitor’s livelihood is at risk. A third alternative would be the US standard of ‘clear and convincing evidence’.

The SDT makes decisions on alleged serious breaches of solicitors’ professional rules, and can impose a fine, order a suspension from practice or strike a solicitor off the Roll.

Issue: 7766 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll