header-logo header-logo

Disclosure

24 July 2013
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Tchenguiz and another and another case v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2013] EWHC 2128 (QB), [2013] All ER (D) 235 (Jul)

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) issued an application seeking: “a declaration that [the SFO] is not prevented by the provisions of the [Criminal Justice Act 1987 (CJA 1987)] from giving disclosure in this action of documents received from third parties in response to notices under s 2 of the CJA 1987 and permitting inspection of such disclosed documents”. The court ruled that the duty of confidence that existed where the police or any other public authority used compulsory powers to obtain information and documents from the citizen was subject to any order of the court, at least in the absence of clear statutory wording to the contrary. The language of CJA 1987 itself did not contain any express prohibition and although not necessarily determinative was an important place to start. Further, an implied restriction was not necessary or proper. Although there was no direct authority on the matter, any authorities that there were pointed against

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll