header-logo header-logo

24 July 2013
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Disclosure

Tchenguiz and another and another case v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2013] EWHC 2128 (QB), [2013] All ER (D) 235 (Jul)

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) issued an application seeking: “a declaration that [the SFO] is not prevented by the provisions of the [Criminal Justice Act 1987 (CJA 1987)] from giving disclosure in this action of documents received from third parties in response to notices under s 2 of the CJA 1987 and permitting inspection of such disclosed documents”. The court ruled that the duty of confidence that existed where the police or any other public authority used compulsory powers to obtain information and documents from the citizen was subject to any order of the court, at least in the absence of clear statutory wording to the contrary. The language of CJA 1987 itself did not contain any express prohibition and although not necessarily determinative was an important place to start. Further, an implied restriction was not necessary or proper. Although there was no direct authority on the matter, any authorities that there were pointed against

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll