header-logo header-logo

28 March 2014
Issue: 7600 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Disclosure

Abbas v Shah [2014] EWHC 662 (QB), [2014] All ER (D) 202 (Mar)

The general rule relating to the sequence in which a defendant might seek disclosure from a claimant and serve a defence of truth, was that he had to serve a defence of truth (if he could) first and then he would be entitled to disclosure which he related to the issues which he had pleaded. A defendant was not entitled to fish for a defence in a claimant’s papers. The same applied to applications for disclosure against non-parties. 

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll