header-logo header-logo

Disclosure & inspection of documents—Production of documents—Production before commencement of proceedings

03 May 2013
Issue: 7558 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Roche Diagnostics Ltd v Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2013] EWHC 933 (TCC), [2013] All ER (D) 133 (Apr)

Queen’s Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court, Coulson J, 19 Apr 2013

The High Court has set out broad principles applicable to applications for early specific disclosure in public procurement cases.

Fionnuala McCredie (instructed by Eversheds LLP) for the claimant. Nigel Giffin QC (instructed by Beachcroft LLP) for the defendant.

The defendant was responsible for a number of hospitals in West Yorkshire. It was seeking to let a managed service contract for the provision of laboratory services at three main centres. In June 2012, the claimant submitted its bid as part of a tender exercise. In November, it was told that it had been unsuccessful and that the successful bidder was another company, A Ltd. The claimant subsequently issued proceedings challenging the fairness of the procurement exercise. There was also a separate dispute, which was not yet the subject of litigation, relating to an interim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll