header-logo header-logo

03 May 2013
Issue: 7558 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Disclosure & inspection of documents—Production of documents—Production before commencement of proceedings

Roche Diagnostics Ltd v Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2013] EWHC 933 (TCC), [2013] All ER (D) 133 (Apr)

Queen’s Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court, Coulson J, 19 Apr 2013

The High Court has set out broad principles applicable to applications for early specific disclosure in public procurement cases.

Fionnuala McCredie (instructed by Eversheds LLP) for the claimant. Nigel Giffin QC (instructed by Beachcroft LLP) for the defendant.

The defendant was responsible for a number of hospitals in West Yorkshire. It was seeking to let a managed service contract for the provision of laboratory services at three main centres. In June 2012, the claimant submitted its bid as part of a tender exercise. In November, it was told that it had been unsuccessful and that the successful bidder was another company, A Ltd. The claimant subsequently issued proceedings challenging the fairness of the procurement exercise. There was also a separate dispute, which was not yet the subject of litigation, relating to an interim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll