header-logo header-logo

Disclosure—Legal professional privilege—Communications between legal adviser and client

21 October 2010
Issue: 7438 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of income tax and another [2010] EWCA Civ 1094, [201

Court of Appeal, Civil Division Mummery, Lloyd and Stanley Burnton LJJ, 13 Oct 2010

The Court of Appeal remains bound by the rule that legal professional privilege does not apply, at common law, in relation to any professional other than a qualified lawyer, save as expressly provided otherwise by statute.

Lord Pannick QC and Conrad McDonnell (instructed by PricewaterhouseCoopers Legal LLP) for the claimants. The first defendant was not represented. Timothy Brennan QC, Diya Sen Gupta and Laura McNair-Wilson (instructed by the Solicitor to HMRC) for the second defendant. Charles Flint QC (instructed by Simmons & Simmons) for the first intervener. Bankim Thanki QC and Ben Valentin (instructed by the Bar Council) for the second intervener. Sir Sydney Kentridge QC and Tom Adam QC (instructed by Herbert Smith LLP) for the third intervener.

The claimant companies had communicated with accountants seeking advice on fiscal liability. That advice had included consideration

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll