header-logo header-logo

Disclosure & victims’ privacy

31 May 2022
Issue: 7981 / Categories: Legal News , Disclosure , Criminal
printer mail-detail
The disclosure guidelines have been changed to stop ‘invasive and disproportionate’ requests for victims’ private information during criminal investigations

The Annual Review of Disclosure, published last week by the Solicitor General, Alex Chalk QC, clarifies that third-party material such as therapy notes and medical records must only be sought where ‘appropriate, proportionate, and balanced with the right to privacy’. Investigators and prosecutors must give justification in writing before they can access such information.

Investigators are to be given guidance on redaction to meet data protection duties in a proportionate way, case files are to be simplified to avoid duplication between investigators, and videos can be clipped and cropped so the CPS is only given relevant information.

Meanwhile, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has advised victims of rape and other crimes not to delay therapy for any reason connected to the police investigation or case.

It published updated pre-trial therapy guidance last week which sought to alleviate victims concerns that accessing counselling could damage the prosecution case. The Guidance on Pre-trial Therapy highlights ‘the health and wellbeing of the victim should always determine decision making with regards to pre-trial therapy’, and warns that criminal justice practitioners should ‘play no role’ in this decision beyond alerting victims to the availability of therapy. However, it cautions that some therapies such as group therapy could present difficulties and may need specific consideration.

The guidance asks police and prosecutors to give ‘very serious consideration as to whether requesting therapy notes represents a reasonable line of enquiry. What is reasonable will depend on the circumstances of the case’. It bans ‘unfocused requests to browse patients’ files’ and insists on compliance with all relevant data protection laws. The therapy notes will only be disclosed to the defence if they contain ‘material capable of undermining the prosecution case or assisting the suspect’.

The guidance also covers the impact of trauma on a victim’s memory and demeanour to help address concerns about inconsistencies in victims’ accounts during therapy.

Siobhan Blake, CPS lead for rape and serious sexual assault prosecutions, said: ‘Balancing a victim’s right to privacy with a suspect’s right to a fair trial is a sensitive issue.’

Issue: 7981 / Categories: Legal News , Disclosure , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll