header-logo header-logo

Disclosure & victims’ privacy

31 May 2022
Issue: 7981 / Categories: Legal News , Disclosure , Criminal
printer mail-detail
The disclosure guidelines have been changed to stop ‘invasive and disproportionate’ requests for victims’ private information during criminal investigations

The Annual Review of Disclosure, published last week by the Solicitor General, Alex Chalk QC, clarifies that third-party material such as therapy notes and medical records must only be sought where ‘appropriate, proportionate, and balanced with the right to privacy’. Investigators and prosecutors must give justification in writing before they can access such information.

Investigators are to be given guidance on redaction to meet data protection duties in a proportionate way, case files are to be simplified to avoid duplication between investigators, and videos can be clipped and cropped so the CPS is only given relevant information.

Meanwhile, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has advised victims of rape and other crimes not to delay therapy for any reason connected to the police investigation or case.

It published updated pre-trial therapy guidance last week which sought to alleviate victims concerns that accessing counselling could damage the prosecution case. The Guidance on Pre-trial Therapy highlights ‘the health and wellbeing of the victim should always determine decision making with regards to pre-trial therapy’, and warns that criminal justice practitioners should ‘play no role’ in this decision beyond alerting victims to the availability of therapy. However, it cautions that some therapies such as group therapy could present difficulties and may need specific consideration.

The guidance asks police and prosecutors to give ‘very serious consideration as to whether requesting therapy notes represents a reasonable line of enquiry. What is reasonable will depend on the circumstances of the case’. It bans ‘unfocused requests to browse patients’ files’ and insists on compliance with all relevant data protection laws. The therapy notes will only be disclosed to the defence if they contain ‘material capable of undermining the prosecution case or assisting the suspect’.

The guidance also covers the impact of trauma on a victim’s memory and demeanour to help address concerns about inconsistencies in victims’ accounts during therapy.

Siobhan Blake, CPS lead for rape and serious sexual assault prosecutions, said: ‘Balancing a victim’s right to privacy with a suspect’s right to a fair trial is a sensitive issue.’

Issue: 7981 / Categories: Legal News , Disclosure , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Taylor Rose—nine promotions

Taylor Rose—nine promotions

Leadership strengthened across core practice areas with nine new partners

Fieldfisher—Rebecca Maxwell

Fieldfisher—Rebecca Maxwell

Real estate team welcomes partner inBirmingham

Ward Hadaway—14 trainee solicitors

Ward Hadaway—14 trainee solicitors

Firm strengthens commitment to nurturing future legal talent

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll