header-logo header-logo

Discount rate concerns persist

11 April 2018
Issue: 7788 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Government struggling to define what full compensation means

A senior lawyer has called for the Lord Chancellor to be held to his commitments on the personal injury discount rate through an amendment to the Civil Liability Bill.

The discount rate, which is set by the Lord Chancellor, is used to calculate likely investment return on damages awarded to a claimant with serious injuries who may need lifelong care.

Writing in NLJ this week, Julian Chamberlayne, partner at Stewarts, welcomes the government’s commitment that the Lord Chancellor will explain the reasons for any new rate in future, including publishing the panel of experts’ report and impact assessments.

However, Chamberlayne warns: ‘To ensure these commitments are not forgotten Schedule A1 to the Civil Liability Bill requires careful scrutiny and amendment, as for instance, it only requires publication of such information as the Lord Chancellor thinks appropriate.’

In terms of numbers, Chamberlayne considers that ‘once tax and investment charges are factored in it is difficult to see now how that rate could exceed 0% and it may well remain negative’. He cites Government Actuary Department figures published in July 2017 that predict a 0% rate would leave about 26% of claimants undercompensated.

The Bill also provides for claimants to receive fixed amounts of compensation for whiplash injuries. Separately, the small claims limit for road traffic accident cases will be raised from £1,000 to £5,000, pushing most whiplash cases to the small claims track, where claimants cannot claim for their legal costs. Both proposals have alarmed lawyers.

Neille Ryan, partner at Furley Page, said: ‘Whiplash awards will be slashed to a few hundred pounds and almost no legal costs will be recoverable by most claimants, who will have to pay lawyers themselves out of their damages, or take on the insurer and their solicitors alone.’

Issue: 7788 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll