header-logo header-logo

Discount rate concerns persist

11 April 2018
Issue: 7788 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Government struggling to define what full compensation means

A senior lawyer has called for the Lord Chancellor to be held to his commitments on the personal injury discount rate through an amendment to the Civil Liability Bill.

The discount rate, which is set by the Lord Chancellor, is used to calculate likely investment return on damages awarded to a claimant with serious injuries who may need lifelong care.

Writing in NLJ this week, Julian Chamberlayne, partner at Stewarts, welcomes the government’s commitment that the Lord Chancellor will explain the reasons for any new rate in future, including publishing the panel of experts’ report and impact assessments.

However, Chamberlayne warns: ‘To ensure these commitments are not forgotten Schedule A1 to the Civil Liability Bill requires careful scrutiny and amendment, as for instance, it only requires publication of such information as the Lord Chancellor thinks appropriate.’

In terms of numbers, Chamberlayne considers that ‘once tax and investment charges are factored in it is difficult to see now how that rate could exceed 0% and it may well remain negative’. He cites Government Actuary Department figures published in July 2017 that predict a 0% rate would leave about 26% of claimants undercompensated.

The Bill also provides for claimants to receive fixed amounts of compensation for whiplash injuries. Separately, the small claims limit for road traffic accident cases will be raised from £1,000 to £5,000, pushing most whiplash cases to the small claims track, where claimants cannot claim for their legal costs. Both proposals have alarmed lawyers.

Neille Ryan, partner at Furley Page, said: ‘Whiplash awards will be slashed to a few hundred pounds and almost no legal costs will be recoverable by most claimants, who will have to pay lawyers themselves out of their damages, or take on the insurer and their solicitors alone.’

Issue: 7788 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll