header-logo header-logo

11 April 2018
Issue: 7788 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Discount rate concerns persist

Government struggling to define what full compensation means

A senior lawyer has called for the Lord Chancellor to be held to his commitments on the personal injury discount rate through an amendment to the Civil Liability Bill.

The discount rate, which is set by the Lord Chancellor, is used to calculate likely investment return on damages awarded to a claimant with serious injuries who may need lifelong care.

Writing in NLJ this week, Julian Chamberlayne, partner at Stewarts, welcomes the government’s commitment that the Lord Chancellor will explain the reasons for any new rate in future, including publishing the panel of experts’ report and impact assessments.

However, Chamberlayne warns: ‘To ensure these commitments are not forgotten Schedule A1 to the Civil Liability Bill requires careful scrutiny and amendment, as for instance, it only requires publication of such information as the Lord Chancellor thinks appropriate.’

In terms of numbers, Chamberlayne considers that ‘once tax and investment charges are factored in it is difficult to see now how that rate could exceed 0% and it may well remain negative’. He cites Government Actuary Department figures published in July 2017 that predict a 0% rate would leave about 26% of claimants undercompensated.

The Bill also provides for claimants to receive fixed amounts of compensation for whiplash injuries. Separately, the small claims limit for road traffic accident cases will be raised from £1,000 to £5,000, pushing most whiplash cases to the small claims track, where claimants cannot claim for their legal costs. Both proposals have alarmed lawyers.

Neille Ryan, partner at Furley Page, said: ‘Whiplash awards will be slashed to a few hundred pounds and almost no legal costs will be recoverable by most claimants, who will have to pay lawyers themselves out of their damages, or take on the insurer and their solicitors alone.’

Issue: 7788 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
back-to-top-scroll