header-logo header-logo

Discrimination by Generation Y

04 September 2014
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Generation Y employees (those under 35 years old) are the age group most likely to discriminate against older employees and those who work flexibly, a report has revealed.

They are also the group most likely to feel they have suffered sex discrimination. However, their support for employment rights does not always extend to those with young families, employees in their 60s or flexible workers, according to a study of 1,000 workers by employment law solicitors Doyle Clayton

The report, Age Before Beauty?, conducted by Censuswide Research,  notes that the negative and discriminatory attitude of many Generation Y employees is particularly important as they form a large element of the workforce and are often frontline managers involved in appraising, monitoring and recruiting staff.

Tina Wisener, partner at Doyle Clayton, says: “It is surprising that Generation Y has the most negative attitude towards flexible working and are most likely to see older colleagues and those who work from home or part-time as less committed to their jobs. 

“Generation Y are characterised as needing to be treated with kid gloves, on the other hand they are the very people whose attitudes make them likely to object to, and perhaps even thwart, initiatives to include working mums and older workers—the people who most appreciate being able to work flexibly. People in their 50s and 60s applying for a job have a lower chance of a fair hearing when interviewed or appraised by Generation Y.”

Wisener advises businesses to ensure appropriate training and coaching for managers, and to provide support to them to ensure part-time and home-workers are included as much as possible and not excluded from training and team activities.

She suggests businesses monitor the workforce to make sure part-time and home workers are not systematically being excluded from training and promotions.

 

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maria Karaiskos KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maria Karaiskos KC, Church Court Chambers

Maria Karaiskos KC, recently appointed as the first female head of Church Court Chambers, discusses breaking down barriers, the lure of the courtroom, and the power of storytelling

Bevan Brittan—Bethan Gladwyn

Bevan Brittan—Bethan Gladwyn

Housing management team expands with specialist partner hire

Ionic Legal—Tania D’Souza Culora

Ionic Legal—Tania D’Souza Culora

Brand protection and IP disputes expertise strengthened with partner hire

NEWS
In a special tribute in this week's NLJ, David Burrows reflects on the retirement of Patrick Allen, co-founder of Hodge Jones & Allen, whose career epitomised the heyday of legal aid
Writing in NLJ this week, Kelvin Rutledge KC of Cornerstone Barristers and Genevieve Screeche-Powell of Field Court Chambers examine the Court of Appeal’s rejection of a discrimination challenge to Tower Hamlets’ housing database
Michael Zander KC, Emeritus Professor at LSE, tracks the turbulent passage of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill through the House of Lords in this week's issue of NLJ. Two marathon debates drew contributions from nearly 200 peers, split between support, opposition and conditional approval
Alistair Mills of Landmark Chambers reflects on the Human Rights Act 1998 a quarter-century after it came into force, in this week's issue of NLJ
In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ, Stephen Gold surveys a raft of procedural changes and quirky disputes shaping civil practice. His message is clear: civil practitioners must brace for continual tweaks, unexpected contentions and rising costs in everyday litigation
back-to-top-scroll