header-logo header-logo

Discrimination by Generation Y

04 September 2014
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Generation Y employees (those under 35 years old) are the age group most likely to discriminate against older employees and those who work flexibly, a report has revealed.

They are also the group most likely to feel they have suffered sex discrimination. However, their support for employment rights does not always extend to those with young families, employees in their 60s or flexible workers, according to a study of 1,000 workers by employment law solicitors Doyle Clayton

The report, Age Before Beauty?, conducted by Censuswide Research,  notes that the negative and discriminatory attitude of many Generation Y employees is particularly important as they form a large element of the workforce and are often frontline managers involved in appraising, monitoring and recruiting staff.

Tina Wisener, partner at Doyle Clayton, says: “It is surprising that Generation Y has the most negative attitude towards flexible working and are most likely to see older colleagues and those who work from home or part-time as less committed to their jobs. 

“Generation Y are characterised as needing to be treated with kid gloves, on the other hand they are the very people whose attitudes make them likely to object to, and perhaps even thwart, initiatives to include working mums and older workers—the people who most appreciate being able to work flexibly. People in their 50s and 60s applying for a job have a lower chance of a fair hearing when interviewed or appraised by Generation Y.”

Wisener advises businesses to ensure appropriate training and coaching for managers, and to provide support to them to ensure part-time and home-workers are included as much as possible and not excluded from training and team activities.

She suggests businesses monitor the workforce to make sure part-time and home workers are not systematically being excluded from training and promotions.

 

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Chronic delays, duplication of work, cancelled hearings and inefficiencies in the family law courts are letting children and victims of domestic abuse down, a Public Accounts Committee (PAC) inquiry has found
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
back-to-top-scroll