header-logo header-logo

01 September 2017 / Karen Moss
Issue: 7759 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Discrimination & post-Pnaiser protection

Karen Moss considers the evolution of discrimination arising from disability under s 15 of the Equality Act 2010

  • The president of the Employment Appeal Tribunal gave important guidance on how tribunals should approach discrimination arising from disability in Pnaiser.

The evolution of the law relating to discrimination arising from disability under s 15 of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) from the previous incarnation of ‘disability-related discrimination’ under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995) has considerably widened the protection given to employees. When Baroness Hale gave her judgment in Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm [2008] 1 AC 1399, [2008] All ER (D) 342 (Jun) (interpreting disability-related discrimination differently to the rest of the House of Lords) she outlined a four-stage test for disability-related discrimination and introduced an element of ‘remoteness’ to s 5(1) of DDA 1995 (applicable at the time).

The four stages set out by Lady Hale were: (a) what is the treatment complained of?; (b) what was the reason for that treatment?; (c) did that reason relate to the disabled

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Mark Price

Freeths—Mark Price

Freeths strengthens restructuring and insolvency team with partner appointment

DWF—Caroline Featherstone, Victoria Neil & Matt Lewsey

DWF—Caroline Featherstone, Victoria Neil & Matt Lewsey

DWF strengthens public inquiries team with trio of high-profile appointments

Excello Law—Claire-Elaine Arthurs, Rhian Horwill & Caroline Lamming-Chowen

Excello Law—Claire-Elaine Arthurs, Rhian Horwill & Caroline Lamming-Chowen

Three-lawyer team hire boosts Excello Law’s property litigation practice

NEWS
Indemnity costs remain exceptional, but parties cannot ignore a case that deteriorates around them. In Lawrence v Associated Newspapers, Mr Justice Nicklin ordered the claimants to pay indemnity costs after finding their conduct, viewed cumulatively, fell ‘well outside the norm’
Public law is in flux following reversals and robust appellate intervention, according to the latest public law update by the team at HSFK for NLJ
Neurotechnology is turning the human mind into an operational domain, exposing gaps in the laws of war
Foreign judgment creditors have gained a route to recovery after the Supreme Court’s ruling in Drelle v Servis-Terminal
Surrogacy is growing in popularity, but parents-to-be face a complex legal framework
back-to-top-scroll