header-logo header-logo

01 September 2017 / Karen Moss
Issue: 7759 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Discrimination & post-Pnaiser protection

Karen Moss considers the evolution of discrimination arising from disability under s 15 of the Equality Act 2010

  • The president of the Employment Appeal Tribunal gave important guidance on how tribunals should approach discrimination arising from disability in Pnaiser.

The evolution of the law relating to discrimination arising from disability under s 15 of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) from the previous incarnation of ‘disability-related discrimination’ under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995) has considerably widened the protection given to employees. When Baroness Hale gave her judgment in Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm [2008] 1 AC 1399, [2008] All ER (D) 342 (Jun) (interpreting disability-related discrimination differently to the rest of the House of Lords) she outlined a four-stage test for disability-related discrimination and introduced an element of ‘remoteness’ to s 5(1) of DDA 1995 (applicable at the time).

The four stages set out by Lady Hale were: (a) what is the treatment complained of?; (b) what was the reason for that treatment?; (c) did that reason relate to the disabled

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll