header-logo header-logo

01 September 2017 / Karen Moss
Issue: 7759 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Discrimination & post-Pnaiser protection

Karen Moss considers the evolution of discrimination arising from disability under s 15 of the Equality Act 2010

  • The president of the Employment Appeal Tribunal gave important guidance on how tribunals should approach discrimination arising from disability in Pnaiser.

The evolution of the law relating to discrimination arising from disability under s 15 of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) from the previous incarnation of ‘disability-related discrimination’ under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995) has considerably widened the protection given to employees. When Baroness Hale gave her judgment in Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm [2008] 1 AC 1399, [2008] All ER (D) 342 (Jun) (interpreting disability-related discrimination differently to the rest of the House of Lords) she outlined a four-stage test for disability-related discrimination and introduced an element of ‘remoteness’ to s 5(1) of DDA 1995 (applicable at the time).

The four stages set out by Lady Hale were: (a) what is the treatment complained of?; (b) what was the reason for that treatment?; (c) did that reason relate to the disabled

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll