header-logo header-logo

Discrimination & post-Pnaiser protection

01 September 2017 / Karen Moss
Issue: 7759 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Karen Moss considers the evolution of discrimination arising from disability under s 15 of the Equality Act 2010

  • The president of the Employment Appeal Tribunal gave important guidance on how tribunals should approach discrimination arising from disability in Pnaiser.

The evolution of the law relating to discrimination arising from disability under s 15 of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) from the previous incarnation of ‘disability-related discrimination’ under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995) has considerably widened the protection given to employees. When Baroness Hale gave her judgment in Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm [2008] 1 AC 1399, [2008] All ER (D) 342 (Jun) (interpreting disability-related discrimination differently to the rest of the House of Lords) she outlined a four-stage test for disability-related discrimination and introduced an element of ‘remoteness’ to s 5(1) of DDA 1995 (applicable at the time).

The four stages set out by Lady Hale were: (a) what is the treatment complained of?; (b) what was the reason for that treatment?; (c) did that reason relate to the disabled

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll