header-logo header-logo

Discrimination & post-Pnaiser protection

01 September 2017 / Karen Moss
Issue: 7759 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Karen Moss considers the evolution of discrimination arising from disability under s 15 of the Equality Act 2010

  • The president of the Employment Appeal Tribunal gave important guidance on how tribunals should approach discrimination arising from disability in Pnaiser.

The evolution of the law relating to discrimination arising from disability under s 15 of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) from the previous incarnation of ‘disability-related discrimination’ under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995) has considerably widened the protection given to employees. When Baroness Hale gave her judgment in Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm [2008] 1 AC 1399, [2008] All ER (D) 342 (Jun) (interpreting disability-related discrimination differently to the rest of the House of Lords) she outlined a four-stage test for disability-related discrimination and introduced an element of ‘remoteness’ to s 5(1) of DDA 1995 (applicable at the time).

The four stages set out by Lady Hale were: (a) what is the treatment complained of?; (b) what was the reason for that treatment?; (c) did that reason relate to the disabled

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll