header-logo header-logo

Dismissed or not dismissed?

08 February 2013 / Peter Taheri
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Features , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment
printer mail-detail

Has a recent High Court ruling created a new concept of accidental dismissal? Peter Taheri reports

In Smith v Trafford Housing Trust [2012] EWHC 3221 (Ch), the claimant, having been demoted, claimed breach of contract while remaining in the trust’s employment. He was awarded only £98, as the High Court held he was wrongfully dismissed. Can that be right, when the employer had not purported to dismiss and the employee never claimed constructive dismissal?

Establishing the Hogg principle

Practitioners are familiar with the concept of constructive dismissal: the employer commits a repudiatory breach of the employment contract, in response to which the employee resigns. Perhaps less everyday is Hogg v Dover College [1990] ICR 39, EAT, where the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim succeeded even though he was still in the respondent’s employ. Understanding Hogg is pre-requisite for a discussion of Smith.

In Hogg, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) found that the employee “was being told that his former contract was from that moment gone”. To the employer’s argument

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll