header-logo header-logo

Dispelling technophobia

03 September 2009 / Susan Knox
Issue: 7383 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Susan Knox claims lawyers cannot ignore the omnipresent call of new technology

Today, many people in the UK include mobile phones, PDAs, instant messaging clients and social networking applications as their primary means of communication. Lawyers are no exception, frequently using these tools in their personal as well as professional lives. Many lawyers nevertheless discount newer means of communication as potential sources of evidence, instead focusing on “traditional” sources of electronic evidence such as hard drives, back-up tapes, CDs and DVDs. However, by avoiding these new technologies and tools, lawyers may be overlooking critical evidence.

Newer means of communication
 

Having more or less completed the move to computers, word processors and e-mail messages, Britons are now swiftly moving toward ever more portable versions of these tools. Once, a laptop computer was viewed as the convenient alternative to being tied to a desk or office. Now, many laptop users read and write e-mail messages while on the go using handheld PDAs that also act as phones, portable music systems, GPS devices, cameras and planners. Some

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll