header-logo header-logo

Dispensing with consultation

10 February 2011 / Justin Bates
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Justin Bates revisits residential service charges

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 makes detailed provision for the regulation of residential service charges payable by long leaseholders. In particular the 1985 Act, s 20 limits the service charges that a tenant can be required to pay in respect, inter alia, of “qualifying works”, ie works on a building or other premises, to £250 in any accounting period unless the landlord has first either (i) consulted the tenant in the prescribed manner (Service Charges (Consultation Requirements) (England) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1987) (the consultation regulations) or, (ii) obtained dispensation from the consultation regulations from the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal (LVT) (s 20 and s 20ZA, 1985 Act). The LVT may dispense with any or all of the consultation regulations if it is reasonable to do so (s 20ZA(1), 1985 Act).
The procedure for qualifying works involving private sector landlords are dealt with in Pt 2, Sch 4 of the consultation regulations. In general terms, there are three “stages” that the landlord must go through. 

  • Stage 1 involves the landlord
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll