header-logo header-logo

10 February 2011 / Justin Bates
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Dispensing with consultation

Justin Bates revisits residential service charges

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 makes detailed provision for the regulation of residential service charges payable by long leaseholders. In particular the 1985 Act, s 20 limits the service charges that a tenant can be required to pay in respect, inter alia, of “qualifying works”, ie works on a building or other premises, to £250 in any accounting period unless the landlord has first either (i) consulted the tenant in the prescribed manner (Service Charges (Consultation Requirements) (England) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1987) (the consultation regulations) or, (ii) obtained dispensation from the consultation regulations from the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal (LVT) (s 20 and s 20ZA, 1985 Act). The LVT may dispense with any or all of the consultation regulations if it is reasonable to do so (s 20ZA(1), 1985 Act).
The procedure for qualifying works involving private sector landlords are dealt with in Pt 2, Sch 4 of the consultation regulations. In general terms, there are three “stages” that the landlord must go through. 

  • Stage 1 involves the landlord
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll