header-logo header-logo

Dispensing with consultation

10 February 2011 / Justin Bates
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Justin Bates revisits residential service charges

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 makes detailed provision for the regulation of residential service charges payable by long leaseholders. In particular the 1985 Act, s 20 limits the service charges that a tenant can be required to pay in respect, inter alia, of “qualifying works”, ie works on a building or other premises, to £250 in any accounting period unless the landlord has first either (i) consulted the tenant in the prescribed manner (Service Charges (Consultation Requirements) (England) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1987) (the consultation regulations) or, (ii) obtained dispensation from the consultation regulations from the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal (LVT) (s 20 and s 20ZA, 1985 Act). The LVT may dispense with any or all of the consultation regulations if it is reasonable to do so (s 20ZA(1), 1985 Act).
The procedure for qualifying works involving private sector landlords are dealt with in Pt 2, Sch 4 of the consultation regulations. In general terms, there are three “stages” that the landlord must go through. 

  • Stage 1 involves the landlord
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll