header-logo header-logo

10 February 2011 / Justin Bates
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Dispensing with consultation

Justin Bates revisits residential service charges

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 makes detailed provision for the regulation of residential service charges payable by long leaseholders. In particular the 1985 Act, s 20 limits the service charges that a tenant can be required to pay in respect, inter alia, of “qualifying works”, ie works on a building or other premises, to £250 in any accounting period unless the landlord has first either (i) consulted the tenant in the prescribed manner (Service Charges (Consultation Requirements) (England) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1987) (the consultation regulations) or, (ii) obtained dispensation from the consultation regulations from the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal (LVT) (s 20 and s 20ZA, 1985 Act). The LVT may dispense with any or all of the consultation regulations if it is reasonable to do so (s 20ZA(1), 1985 Act).
The procedure for qualifying works involving private sector landlords are dealt with in Pt 2, Sch 4 of the consultation regulations. In general terms, there are three “stages” that the landlord must go through. 

  • Stage 1 involves the landlord
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll