header-logo header-logo

02 September 2011 / Jon Holbrook
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Opinion , Housing
printer mail-detail

The dispossessed?

Jon Holbrook assesses the ability of councils to bring possession proceedings against tenants involved in the recent riots

In the wake of the riots that swept through several cities in August, the Prime Minister stated that people who “loot and pillage their own community” should be evicted from council houses. A number of authorities, including Wandsworth, Westminster, Greenwich, Hammersmith and Fulham, Nottingham and Salford have either served eviction notices or said they will consider serving them in an attempt to evict those involved in the riots.

The desirability of the proposal has provoked much comment but this article considers the legal issues that are most likely to arise when possession proceedings are brought against council tenants who either rioted or who live with family members who did. Although concerned primarily with council tenancies, similar issues would arise for housing associations and private landlords as the legislation is materially the same under the Housing Acts 1985 and 1988.

Locality

Since it was introduced by the Housing Act 1996 (HA 1996), local authority landlords have been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll