header-logo header-logo

02 September 2011 / Jon Holbrook
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Opinion , Housing
printer mail-detail

The dispossessed?

Jon Holbrook assesses the ability of councils to bring possession proceedings against tenants involved in the recent riots

In the wake of the riots that swept through several cities in August, the Prime Minister stated that people who “loot and pillage their own community” should be evicted from council houses. A number of authorities, including Wandsworth, Westminster, Greenwich, Hammersmith and Fulham, Nottingham and Salford have either served eviction notices or said they will consider serving them in an attempt to evict those involved in the riots.

The desirability of the proposal has provoked much comment but this article considers the legal issues that are most likely to arise when possession proceedings are brought against council tenants who either rioted or who live with family members who did. Although concerned primarily with council tenancies, similar issues would arise for housing associations and private landlords as the legislation is materially the same under the Housing Acts 1985 and 1988.

Locality

Since it was introduced by the Housing Act 1996 (HA 1996), local authority landlords have been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll