header-logo header-logo

The dispossessed?

02 September 2011 / Jon Holbrook
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Opinion , Housing
printer mail-detail

Jon Holbrook assesses the ability of councils to bring possession proceedings against tenants involved in the recent riots

In the wake of the riots that swept through several cities in August, the Prime Minister stated that people who “loot and pillage their own community” should be evicted from council houses. A number of authorities, including Wandsworth, Westminster, Greenwich, Hammersmith and Fulham, Nottingham and Salford have either served eviction notices or said they will consider serving them in an attempt to evict those involved in the riots.

The desirability of the proposal has provoked much comment but this article considers the legal issues that are most likely to arise when possession proceedings are brought against council tenants who either rioted or who live with family members who did. Although concerned primarily with council tenancies, similar issues would arise for housing associations and private landlords as the legislation is materially the same under the Housing Acts 1985 and 1988.

Locality

Since it was introduced by the Housing Act 1996 (HA 1996), local authority landlords have been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll