header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
11 December 2019 / Chris Williams
Issue: 7868 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Disputes across the generations

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
13034
The wills of Beryl Parsonage illustrate the meaning of want of knowledge and approval, writes Chris Williams
  • Testamentary capacity, want of knowledge and approval.

The test for testamentary capacity is as set out in Banks v Goodfellow (1870) rather than the law as to lack of capacity under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. In the recent case of In the estate of Beryl Parsonage (deceased) [2019] EWHC 2362 (Ch), a distinction is drawn between testamentary capacity and want of knowledge and approval, with the testatrix being found to have testamentary capacity in respect of her 2010 and 2011 wills, but her 2010 will determined to be invalid for want of knowledge and approval.

The Parsonage case

Beryl Parsonage had four children: Sian, Alison, Ian and Duncan. She also had eight grandchildren (all adult by the time of trial). Beryl’s husband, Keith, pre-deceased her. Beryl died on 18 November 2015 aged 86 years. Her net estate was worth in the order of £400,000 but there was also an overage entitlement which was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

Nick Vernon of Walkers on swapping Birmingham for Bermuda and building an employment practice by the sea

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Global firm re-elects CEO for second term

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Business appoints managing director of operational excellence

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas
Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll