header-logo header-logo

11 December 2019 / Chris Williams
Issue: 7868 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Disputes across the generations

13034
The wills of Beryl Parsonage illustrate the meaning of want of knowledge and approval, writes Chris Williams
  • Testamentary capacity, want of knowledge and approval.

The test for testamentary capacity is as set out in Banks v Goodfellow (1870) rather than the law as to lack of capacity under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. In the recent case of In the estate of Beryl Parsonage (deceased) [2019] EWHC 2362 (Ch), a distinction is drawn between testamentary capacity and want of knowledge and approval, with the testatrix being found to have testamentary capacity in respect of her 2010 and 2011 wills, but her 2010 will determined to be invalid for want of knowledge and approval.

The Parsonage case

Beryl Parsonage had four children: Sian, Alison, Ian and Duncan. She also had eight grandchildren (all adult by the time of trial). Beryl’s husband, Keith, pre-deceased her. Beryl died on 18 November 2015 aged 86 years. Her net estate was worth in the order of £400,000 but there was also an overage entitlement which was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll