header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
11 December 2019 / Chris Williams
Issue: 7868 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Disputes across the generations

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
13034
The wills of Beryl Parsonage illustrate the meaning of want of knowledge and approval, writes Chris Williams
  • Testamentary capacity, want of knowledge and approval.

The test for testamentary capacity is as set out in Banks v Goodfellow (1870) rather than the law as to lack of capacity under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. In the recent case of In the estate of Beryl Parsonage (deceased) [2019] EWHC 2362 (Ch), a distinction is drawn between testamentary capacity and want of knowledge and approval, with the testatrix being found to have testamentary capacity in respect of her 2010 and 2011 wills, but her 2010 will determined to be invalid for want of knowledge and approval.

The Parsonage case

Beryl Parsonage had four children: Sian, Alison, Ian and Duncan. She also had eight grandchildren (all adult by the time of trial). Beryl’s husband, Keith, pre-deceased her. Beryl died on 18 November 2015 aged 86 years. Her net estate was worth in the order of £400,000 but there was also an overage entitlement which was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Read All
‘Lost years’ precedent overturned
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
NLJ this week: Neutral counsel in a polarised age
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
NLJ this week: Short lets & sharp covenants
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
NLJ this week: Justice at the algorithm’s edge
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
NLJ this week: When ‘milk’ really means milk
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll