header-logo header-logo

Distant relatives

21 October 2011 / Laura Bednall
Issue: 7486 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Laura Bednall tells a cautionary tale of international surrogacy

As increasing numbers of people across the globe are turning to surrogacy agreements to fulfil their hope of having a family, governments and courts are finding they need to reassess the policies and legislation which govern the regulation of surrogacy agreements. While surrogacy has been propelled into the media through high-profile court decisions and celebrity endorsement, the existing legislation has been far outpaced by medical advances. It is becoming clear that our domestic law is not really suited to the escalating demand for surrogacy, particularly on an international scale.

Recently introduced legislation has, for the first time, provided same-sex couples and single people with the opportunity to start families of their own, resulting in a rapid expansion of the commercial surrogacy industry. Due to limitations of domestic law, international surrogacy agreements are proving to be the most convenient forum for many commissioning parents. This growth in international demand has seen the conflicting laws and practices of different countries create a legal minefield for commissioning parents in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll