header-logo header-logo

21 October 2011 / Laura Bednall
Issue: 7486 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Distant relatives

Laura Bednall tells a cautionary tale of international surrogacy

As increasing numbers of people across the globe are turning to surrogacy agreements to fulfil their hope of having a family, governments and courts are finding they need to reassess the policies and legislation which govern the regulation of surrogacy agreements. While surrogacy has been propelled into the media through high-profile court decisions and celebrity endorsement, the existing legislation has been far outpaced by medical advances. It is becoming clear that our domestic law is not really suited to the escalating demand for surrogacy, particularly on an international scale.

Recently introduced legislation has, for the first time, provided same-sex couples and single people with the opportunity to start families of their own, resulting in a rapid expansion of the commercial surrogacy industry. Due to limitations of domestic law, international surrogacy agreements are proving to be the most convenient forum for many commissioning parents. This growth in international demand has seen the conflicting laws and practices of different countries create a legal minefield for commissioning parents in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll