header-logo header-logo

Distant relatives

21 October 2011 / Laura Bednall
Issue: 7486 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Laura Bednall tells a cautionary tale of international surrogacy

As increasing numbers of people across the globe are turning to surrogacy agreements to fulfil their hope of having a family, governments and courts are finding they need to reassess the policies and legislation which govern the regulation of surrogacy agreements. While surrogacy has been propelled into the media through high-profile court decisions and celebrity endorsement, the existing legislation has been far outpaced by medical advances. It is becoming clear that our domestic law is not really suited to the escalating demand for surrogacy, particularly on an international scale.

Recently introduced legislation has, for the first time, provided same-sex couples and single people with the opportunity to start families of their own, resulting in a rapid expansion of the commercial surrogacy industry. Due to limitations of domestic law, international surrogacy agreements are proving to be the most convenient forum for many commissioning parents. This growth in international demand has seen the conflicting laws and practices of different countries create a legal minefield for commissioning parents in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll